ICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2019.8761300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misbehavior Detection using Machine Learning in Vehicular Communication Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the intrusion detection mechanism can detect and prevent inside attackers. Many works can be found in the literature for intrusion detection, and some recent works have shown that a high detection rate could achieve using machine learning based methods [132], [133]. However, the efficiency of these kinds of schemes could be further improved to fit V2X applications.…”
Section: G Intrusion Detection Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the intrusion detection mechanism can detect and prevent inside attackers. Many works can be found in the literature for intrusion detection, and some recent works have shown that a high detection rate could achieve using machine learning based methods [132], [133]. However, the efficiency of these kinds of schemes could be further improved to fit V2X applications.…”
Section: G Intrusion Detection Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23][24][25] (3) Category 3: studies satisfying the filtering criteria for Category 2, but not including DDoS attacks. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] (4) Category 4: studies that used ML techniques trained on datasets to evaluate detection of different attacks including DDoS, but not on a VANET environment architecture. [35][36][37][38][39][40] (5) Category 5: studies introducing frameworks for generating datasets for the VANET environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have presented different ML techniques trained on datasets for detecting different types of attacks; however, they have not included or considered DDoS attacks. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Ghaleb et al 26 used ANN model to detect malicious traffic in VANET. They trained ANN on a next generation simulation (NGSIM) dataset using MATLAB tools, and the results showed an accuracy of 99%.…”
Section: Ml-based Studies For Malicious Attacks On Vanetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gyawali et al [4] also used the dataset for an ML application using a Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN) and an SVM. They calculated their solution's detection metrics including the accuracy, precision, recall and F 1 Score.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%