2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miscarriage and early first trimester growth restriction by ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than continuous pregnancy, the fetal heart rate in the group experiencing fetal loss showed a statistically significant drop in the current study. The current study is consistent with several earlier studies that discovered that most individuals with EHRs less than 100 BPM had poor outcomes [22][23][24] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…More than continuous pregnancy, the fetal heart rate in the group experiencing fetal loss showed a statistically significant drop in the current study. The current study is consistent with several earlier studies that discovered that most individuals with EHRs less than 100 BPM had poor outcomes [22][23][24] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…(9) . Balsane et al (10), Agarwal et al (11), and Abu Elghar et al (12) are only a few of the studies that agree with the findings of the current study. Abdulkadhim et al showed that individuals whose embryonic heart rates were below 100 beats per minute had a poor prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[11] Also Jauniaux et al 2005 proved that in pregnancies with a live fetus at 6-10-weeks' gestation the rate of subsequent fetal loss is associated to maternal age, and the ultrasound findings of small GSD and fetal bradycardia (FHR bradycardia), relative to CRL. [12] Also, the current research is in accordance with many other researches as Balsane et al, [13] 2017, Agarwal et al, [14] 2017 and Abu Elghar et al, [15] 2013, S Abdulkadhim et al, [16] 2017found that with majority of patients with embryonic heart rate <100 BPM ended up with poor outcome. Regarding the FHR, Most of the patients who had poor first trimester outcome had EHR below 100 BPM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%