2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miscarriage rate comparison of PGS cycles performed with array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH) and next generation sequencing (NGS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same approach, we also found significantly more mosaic embryos in lost pregnancies than in ongoing pregnancies (P¼ .0062) (24). The miscarriage rate after replacing embryos classified as euploid by means of NGS has been determined to be 6%, compared with 13% for aCGH (32) and 20% for qPCR (33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Using the same approach, we also found significantly more mosaic embryos in lost pregnancies than in ongoing pregnancies (P¼ .0062) (24). The miscarriage rate after replacing embryos classified as euploid by means of NGS has been determined to be 6%, compared with 13% for aCGH (32) and 20% for qPCR (33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%