2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-020-01661-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mischievous Responders and Sexual Minority Youth Survey Data: A Brief History, Recent Methodological Advances, and Implications for Research and Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deliberate lying in survey responses has long been documented (Cimpian & Timmer, 2020;Fan et al, 2002), and some researchers attribute such behavior to intentional efforts to appear humorous, or to shock or upset (i.e., to "troll") survey administrators (Lopez & Hillygus, 2018). What is clear, is that a small subset of survey participants have a tendency to simultaneously claim to identify with low frequency identities, hold unlikely opinions, and frequently engage in atypical behaviors, and that controlling for such unlikely respondents can dramatically influence a study's results (Cimpian & Timmer, 2020;Fan et al, 2002;Lopez & Hillygus, 2018;Robinson-Cimpian, 2014). On the basis of such research, we suspect that questions concerning the use of pornographic magazines and to even greater extent the commission of sexual aggression may be attractive targets for exaggeration among malicious survey respondents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deliberate lying in survey responses has long been documented (Cimpian & Timmer, 2020;Fan et al, 2002), and some researchers attribute such behavior to intentional efforts to appear humorous, or to shock or upset (i.e., to "troll") survey administrators (Lopez & Hillygus, 2018). What is clear, is that a small subset of survey participants have a tendency to simultaneously claim to identify with low frequency identities, hold unlikely opinions, and frequently engage in atypical behaviors, and that controlling for such unlikely respondents can dramatically influence a study's results (Cimpian & Timmer, 2020;Fan et al, 2002;Lopez & Hillygus, 2018;Robinson-Cimpian, 2014). On the basis of such research, we suspect that questions concerning the use of pornographic magazines and to even greater extent the commission of sexual aggression may be attractive targets for exaggeration among malicious survey respondents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that; a) there will be a high correlation between cleanliness practices and health outcomes, and b) taking problematic respondents out of the analytic sample will attenuate the association between cleanliness practices and health outcomes. As mentioned above, previous studies have shown that taking problematic respondents out of the analytic sample attenuates correlations (see Cimpian and Timmer, 2020). This is because problematic respondents tend to acquiesce to multiple unrelated survey items, artificially driving up correlations between unrelated events.. We thus hypothesized that the association between cleanliness practices and health outcomes will be very high among problematic respondents and will be very low among non-problematic respondents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One of the major threats to validity in survey research comes from participants who are inattentive, respond randomly to survey questions (Kim et al, 2018; King, Kim, and McCabe, 2018; see Chandler, Paolacci and Hauser, 2020 for review), or are ‘mischievous’, providing responses that are intentionally false or misleading (Fan et al, 2006; Robinson-Cimpian, 2014; Kramer, Rubin and Coster, 2014; Fish and Russell, 2018; Kaltiala-Heino and Lindberg, 2019; Li, Follingstad. Campe, and Chahal, 2020; see Cimpian et al, 2020 for a review). Inattentive and mischievous respondents (collectively referred to in this report as ‘problematic respondents’) can bias the results of surveys by dramatically inflating point estimates and creating illusory associations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, estimated declines in sexual experience in the YRBS may be influenced by changing patterns of social desirability for this behavior. Additionally, being an in-school, self-administered survey, the YRBS may be more susceptible than the NSFG to motivated misreporting of sensitive behaviors, whether because of social desirability or other types of peer influence [32][33][34]. Indeed, alcohol use-another sensitive behavior for adolescents-also has a higher prevalence in the YRBS than the NSFG.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%