Miscibility of poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) with polymethacrylates or poly(methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine)

Feraz, Fatima; Hamou, Assia Siham Hadj; Djadoun, Saïd

doi:10.1016/0014-3057(95)00003-8

Cited by 18 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a previous study, 4 we have shown from the polymer-polymer interaction parameter, as determined by inverse gas chromatography, that poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) containing 20 mol % acrylic acid units is miscible in all proportions with poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) and poly(ethyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine); it has also been reported 5,6 that poly(styrene-co-methacrylic acid) containing 8, 12, 24, or 29 mol % methacrylic acid units in poly(styrene-co-methacrylic acid) (SMA) copolymers is immiscible with poly(butyl methacrylate). On the other hand, 6 poly(styrene-comethacrylic acid) containing 12, 24, or 29 mol % methacrylic acid units in SMA copolymers and poly-(butyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine) with different compositions of 4-vinylpyridine are miscible.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Miscibility and complexation behavior in poly(ethyl methacrylate)/poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid), poly[2‐(N,N‐dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate]/poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid), and poly{styrene‐co‐[2‐(N,N‐dimethyl amino) ethyl methacrylate]}/poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) systems

Abdellaoui

Djadoun

2005

J of Applied Polymer Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This contribution presents a study of the hydrogen-bonding interactions between poly(styrene-comethacrylic acid) containing 22 mol % methacrylic acid (SMA-22) and poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA), poly Ndimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate] (PMAD), or poly{styrene-co- [2-(N,N-dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate]} containing 3, 12, or 21 mol % 2-(N,N-dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (SMAD-3, SMAD-12, or SMAD-21) by viscometry and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). On the basis of the analysis of DSC thermograms and viscometric measurements, polymer miscibility was observed with the PEMA/SMA-22 system. This miscibility was due to hydrogen-bonding specific interactions between carbonyl groups of PEMA and carboxylic groups of SMA-22. The SMAD-3/SMA-22 system was immiscible, whereas complexation was observed with PMAD/SMA-22, SMAD-21/SMA-22, and SMAD-12/SMA-22 mixtures in butan-2-one. This complexation was due to stronger interactions between poly(styrene-co-methacrylic acid) and the 2-(N,N-dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate groups of PMAD or SMAD copolymers, as evidenced by viscometry and DSC. A similar phenomenon was observed for PMAD/SMA-22 and SMAD-21/SMA-22 mixtures in tetrahydrofuran. For the SMAD-12/SMA-22 system in this solvent, such behavior was noted only in the presence of an excess of the copolymer SMAD-12. This study showed that the minimum amount of interacting species required for the interpolymer complexation was higher in tetrahydrofuran than in butan-2-one. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 658 -664, 2005

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Miscibility and complexation behavior in poly(ethyl methacrylate)/poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid), poly[2‐(N,N‐dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate]/poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid), and poly{styrene‐co‐[2‐(N,N‐dimethyl amino) ethyl methacrylate]}/poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) systems

Abdellaoui

Djadoun

2005

J of Applied Polymer Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There were a lot of attempts to solve the problem [27][28][29] of so-called "probe dependence" of polymer-polymer interaction and to develop a method to evaluate the probe-independent interaction.…”

Section: Theoreticalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Feraz, Hamou and Djadoun [28] used IGC ( ' 23 χ parameter) and DSC (T g of blends) to interpret the miscibility of polymer blend of poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) with poly(ethyl methacrylate) or poly(isobutyl methacrylate) or poly(ethyl methacrylate-co-4-vinyl pyridine) or poly(isobutyl methacrylate-co-4-vinyl pyridine). SAA/PIBMA was found to be immiscible as confirmed by the observation of two glass transition temperatures and the positive ' 23 χ values.…”

Section: Theoreticalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Properties of materials as determined by inverse gas chromatography

Voelkel¹,

Adamska²

2009

Annales UMCS, Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The miscibility of most polymer blends is attributed to either specific intermolecular interactions. [7][8][9][10] Biopolymeric membranes, which utilize polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactic acid (PLA), chitosan (CS), alginate (AL), and polyhydroxyalcanoate (PHA), are the dominant biomembranes used for various applications. [11][12][13][14][15] Several configurations of membrane modules, such as tubular, flat sheet/plate-and-frame, spiral wound, and hollow fiber, have been used in water purification.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The miscibility of most polymer blends is attributed to either specific intermolecular interactions. [ 7–10 ]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Low Cost Biopolymer Adsorbents for the Removal of Heavy Metal Contaminant from Wastewater

Berdous

Abdellaoui

Arous

et al. 2023

Macromolecular Symposia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Polymeric materials have been remarkably associated with our daily life. The hydrophilic/hydrophobic biopolymer systems have gained importance in the last few years, because of the environmental pollution of nonbiodegradable synthetic plastics. Recently, biopolymers with functional groups have been directly used for the fabrication of adsorptive membranes in order to avoid the undesirable morphology change of the membranes during the surface modifications. Compared with other modification technologies or a synthesis of totally new materials, biopolymer blending has several advantages like simplicity, reproducibility, and commercial feasibility. The valuable part of blending of biopolymers can be used for the preparation of new materials with improved physicochemical and mechanical properties. The objective of this work is the development of biomembranes based on a mixture of three biopolymers, that is, alginate (AL), chitosan (CS), and polylactic acid (PLA). Physical characterizations of the elaborated biopolymeric membranes are carried out by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and contact angle measurements. The SEM results show that the synthesized membranes exhibited homogeneous dense microstructures. The second objective of this paper is to evaluate the importance of these biopolymers in removing lead which is considered as toxic metal. In fact, all synthesized membranes are applied to the treatment of wastewater to eliminate heavy metals principally

show abstract

Miscibility of poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) with polymethacrylates or poly(methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine)

Cited by 18 publications

References 20 publications

Properties of materials as determined by inverse gas chromatography

Low Cost Biopolymer Adsorbents for the Removal of Heavy Metal Contaminant from Wastewater

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About