Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country

Abstract

BackgroundMisconduct in research tarnishes the reputation, credibility and integrity of research institutions. Studies on research or scientific misconduct are still novel in developing countries. In this study, we report on the attitudes, perceptions and factors related to the work environment thought to be associated with research misconduct in a group of researchers in Nigeria - a developing country.MethodA survey of researchers attending a scientific conference was done using an adapted Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire-Revised (SMQ-R). Initial descriptive analysis of individual items using frequencies and proportions for all quantitative data was performed. Thereafter, Likert scale responses were transformed into dichotomous responses. Fisher exact test was performed for associations as appropriate. A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was accepted as significant.ResultHalf of the respondents (50.4%) were aware of a colleague who had committed misconduct, defined as “non-adherence to rules, regulations, guidelines, and commonly accepted professional codes or norms”. Over 88% of the researchers were concerned about the perceived amount of misconduct prevalent in their institution and 96.2% believed that one or more forms of scientific misconduct had occurred in their workplace. More than half (52.7%) rated the severity of penalties for scientific misconduct in their work environment as low. Furthermore¸ the majority (56.1%) were of the view that the chance of getting caught for scientific misconduct in their work environment was low.ConclusionResearchers in Nigeria perceive that scientific misconduct is commonplace in their institutions, but are however worried about the negative effects of scientific misconduct on the credibility of scientific research. We recommend that researchers be empowered with the knowledge and virtues necessary for self-regulation that advance research integrity. Research institutions should however also step into their role of fostering a responsible research ethic and discouraging misconduct.

Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China

“…Since plagiarism is also a common problem among researchers and academics, it is important to test perceptions of plagiarism among scientific researchers of different cultures. Past studies among scientific researchers primarily examined the prevalence of plagiarism and attitudes towards specific forms of plagiarism [25,26], as opposed to the very substance of plagiarism. As a consequence, little is known about the understanding of plagiarism among scientific researchers with different cultural backgrounds.…”

Attitudes of researchers towards plagiarism: A study on a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

“…Numerous studies have been conducted in different countries to determine the attitudes and perceptions regarding plagiarism, for example, India (Khairnar et al, 2019), Nigeria (Iloh, Agwu Nkwa Amadi, Chukwuonye, & Godswill-Uko, 2018;Okonta & Rossouw, 2014), Malaysia (Lawa, Tingb, & Jerome, 2013), and Europe (Pupovac et al, 2010). However, in Saudi Arabia, few studies have explored plagiarism, and these have focused on academic institutions (Kattan et al, 2017;Qutub et al, 2016;Ryan et al, 2009).…”

Morals, morale and motivations in data fabrication: Medical research fieldworkers views and practices in two Sub-Saharan African contexts

“…Consequently, our understanding of fabrication barely considers the masses of ‘invisible’ fieldworkers, technicians, students and other ‘hired hands’ involved in quotidian aspects of research work ( Roth, 1966 , Shapin, 1989 , Timmermans and McKay, 2009 ). Moreover, studies of fabrication rarely involve low-income settings in the global South ( Ana et al., 2013 , Fanelli, 2009 , Okonta and Rossouw, 2014 ), where a considerable proportion of medical research takes place ( Petryna, 2009 ).…”