Misdiagnosed Tooth Aspiration in a Young Handicapped Boy: Case Report and Recommendations

Canceill, Thibault; Esclassan, Rémi; Marty, Mathieu; Valera, Marie-Cécile; Trzaskawka-Moulis, Estelle; Noirrit‐Esclassan, Emmanuelle

doi:10.1155/2019/8495739

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The characteristics of the 50 14–63 included case reports are presented in Table 1. The majority of the corresponding authors were from Brazil ( n = 11) and India ( n = 11).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical analysis of the reporting quality of case reports focusing on dental traumatology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Case reports in Endodontics 2020 checklist: A baseline evaluation prior to checklist publication

Nagendrababu

Sarao

Berlin-Broner

et al. 2023

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/AimsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Case Reports in Endodontics (PRICE) 2020 guidelines were published to help authors produce high‐quality case reports. The aim of this study was to use the PRICE 2020 guidelines to appraise a sample of 50 case reports related to dental traumatology that were published before the guidelines were available in order to assess various parameters influencing the reporting quality.MethodsFifty case reports published between 2015 and 2019 and related to dental traumatology were randomly selected from the PubMed database. Reports were assessed by two independent evaluators using the PRICE checklist. Each item received a score of “1” if the manuscript met all pertinent criteria, “0” if it was not reported, and “0.5” if it was reported insufficiently. “Not Applicable” (NA) was assigned to items that were irrelevant to a specific report. The estimated total PRICE score for each case report was computed by adding all the scores, with a maximum score of 47 minus any “NA” scores. Descriptive and Inferential statistics (Student's t‐test and ANOVA) were used for analysis.ResultsThe percentage of case reports that fully met each applicable criteria ranged from 0% to 100%. The percentage of case reports partially satisfying each applicable criterion varied from 0% to 88%. There was a significant difference in scores for case reports published in journals with an impact factor compared with those without (p = .042). No significant difference was observed between the mean scores that compared the period of publication. There was no significant difference between journals that followed the CARE guidelines and those that did not.ConclusionSeveral items within the PRICE 2020 guidelines were either not reported or only partially reported in case reports related to dental traumatology prior to the checklist publication. It is recommended that authors follow the PRICE 2020 guidelines to improve the overall quality of their case reports.

show abstract

“…The characteristics of the 50 14–63 included case reports are presented in Table 1. The majority of the corresponding authors were from Brazil ( n = 11) and India ( n = 11).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical analysis of the reporting quality of case reports focusing on dental traumatology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Case reports in Endodontics 2020 checklist: A baseline evaluation prior to checklist publication

Nagendrababu

Sarao

Berlin-Broner

et al. 2023

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Few cases of dental aspiration have been reported to date, and the incidence rate is approximately 0.4%. Some of these cases occurred after traumatic events such as maxillofacial trauma, 6 oral surgery under general anesthesia, 7 adenotonsillectomy, 8 tooth extraction, 9 and endotracheal intubation. 10 , 11 Although dental aspiration often occurs after maxillofacial trauma or oral surgery, it can also occur in other situations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental aspiration in a pediatric patient: a case report

Xu,

Wu,

Chen

2023

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Foreign body aspiration is relatively common in children, especially in children younger than 3 years, and it is associated with a high incidence and mortality rate. Because of impairments in swallowing, speech, and vision, more caution regarding foreign body aspiration is required in children with abnormal nervous system development. This report describes a clinically rare case involving a 6-year-old patient with delayed brain development and epilepsy who was found to have a tooth in the bronchus of the left lung through fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The tooth was successfully removed by an extraction procedure. A follow-up examination showed that the patient had a sequela of left lower lobe atelectasis. This case indicates that greater caution is necessary regarding foreign body aspiration, including dental aspiration, in patients with abnormal development of the nervous system.

show abstract

“…The second case report concerned a tooth inhalation, by a young 4-year-old disabled (Down syndrome) boy. 8 After an injury resulting in a complex coronal fracture with pulp exposure of the 61 (upper left deciduous incisor), the tooth was extracted under local anesthesia. Despite using an equimolar oxygen nitrous oxide mix, the patient became very restless.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Morbidity and Mortality Review in a University Dental Hospital: A Necessary Tool to Improve Quality of Care

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The study aimed to describe and to analyze the first morbidity and mortality review (MMRs) set up within a Dental University Hospital using detailed case reports to highlight the benefits of MMRs for patients, practitioners, teachers and to implement appropriate protocols to prevent recurrence. Materials and Methods The MMRs were performed within the dentistry departments of the hospital over the 1-year study period. Each case was reviewed according to a protocol based on a tool defined by the Clinical Risk Unit and the Association of Litigation and Risk Management (ALARM). Results Four cases were selected based on an oral report by a doctor from the dental service, a downstream service, or by the attending physician. The first case report related to a patient who suffered a breathing shock. The second concerned a tooth inhalation by a young disabled boy. The third was a therapeutic failure instigated by a student during a tooth preparation, and the fourth case involved an unexpected face-to-face meeting between a prisoner accompanied by police guards and an ancient victim at the dental hospital. Discussion Clinical incidents were investigated with the ALARM protocol. This process is also less focused on the individual who makes the error and more on contributing systemic factors. The systematic analysis of cases associated with bibliographic reviews improves learning and performance outcomes. Clear answers were given in response to the problems raised during these MMRs. Conclusion In dental hospitals, the culture of MMRs needs to be integrated into resident training like in medical hospitals.

show abstract

Misdiagnosed Tooth Aspiration in a Young Handicapped Boy: Case Report and Recommendations

Cited by 6 publications

References 24 publications

Critical analysis of the reporting quality of case reports focusing on dental traumatology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Case reports in Endodontics 2020 checklist: A baseline evaluation prior to checklist publication

Critical analysis of the reporting quality of case reports focusing on dental traumatology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Case reports in Endodontics 2020 checklist: A baseline evaluation prior to checklist publication

Dental aspiration in a pediatric patient: a case report

Morbidity and Mortality Review in a University Dental Hospital: A Necessary Tool to Improve Quality of Care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About