2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misdiagnosis of Appendicitis and the Use of Diagnostic Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
94
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
94
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, the evaluation of the surgeon had a positive predictive value of 83.9%. This data, comparable to that found in the literature, reinforce the importance of clinical symptoms and signs for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, configuring an index of non-therapeutic interventions in 16.0% of patients, very similar to data cited in the literature 9,10 . In this research, the clinical picture presented typically, with the classical evolution of pain in 80.9% of patients, including those with confirmed diagnosis of acute appendicitis.…”
Section: Results Results Results Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that study, the evaluation of the surgeon had a positive predictive value of 83.9%. This data, comparable to that found in the literature, reinforce the importance of clinical symptoms and signs for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, configuring an index of non-therapeutic interventions in 16.0% of patients, very similar to data cited in the literature 9,10 . In this research, the clinical picture presented typically, with the classical evolution of pain in 80.9% of patients, including those with confirmed diagnosis of acute appendicitis.…”
Section: Results Results Results Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, the correct and early diagnosis aims to reduce the most serious cases, accompanied by perforation and peritonitis, which increases the incidence of complications from 3 to 47% 4 . The employment of imaging methods to assist the diagnosis of appendicitis is still far from consensus, as works like the one from Flumen et al 9,28 show that even with the use of ultrasound and CT scan, the rate of nontherapeutic resection persists in expressive percentage (15%), notably in women of reproductive age and patients in extremes of age.…”
Section: Results Results Results Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, laboratory tests, which usually include blood sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), coagulation profile, and haemogram, can also be used to detect the presence of inflammation. In some cases, the abdomen is even X-rayed (Flum et al, 2005).…”
Section: Medical Background and Considerations For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the researchers recommended imaging only when the diagnosis is unclear, and for these cases CT is usually the preferred method of imaging. The same group published a longitudinal study in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons in December 2005 confirming the unchanged rate of negative appendectomy despite increasing use of CT and ultrasound [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%