2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05231.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misdiagnosis of hereditary angio-oedema type 1 and type 2

Abstract: We recommend that all suspected cases of hereditary angio-oedema are reviewed, that specialist advice is sought before making the diagnosis and that the diagnosis is only made after initial abnormal serology is confirmed on a second sample.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that pitfalls in the diagnosis are common, with 11 of 42 cases reviewed recently found to have a questionable diagnosis [28]. Established or transferring cases should be reviewed for validity of the diagnosis.…”
Section: Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that pitfalls in the diagnosis are common, with 11 of 42 cases reviewed recently found to have a questionable diagnosis [28]. Established or transferring cases should be reviewed for validity of the diagnosis.…”
Section: Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gompels et al described two patients who appeared to have undetectable concentrations of C1 esterase inhibitor on one system, but which could be measured on theirs, and who also had normal C4 concentrations. 5 We still do not know what caused our patient's original angioedema: C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency has been excluded and allergy, although not excluded, looks unlikely; in addition, because the swelling subsided, amyloid is an unlikely explanation. Infection is possible because of his raised C reactive protein concentration, but he reported no changes in the drugs that he was taking, so that an adverse drug reaction seems unlikely, and no physical trauma was reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If the C4 level is normal, analysis of the C1-INH level is usually not necessary (25). Tests of C1-INH levels are not always the first diagnostic test administered because they have been associated with a large number of false positives (26% in one study) and should be reviewed by a specialist before a diagnosis is made (26).…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%