2006
DOI: 10.1785/0120060012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misfit Criteria for Quantitative Comparison of Seismograms

Abstract: or semianalytical solutions. A set of testing examples is included, together with their thorough descriptions and reference solu­ tions, allowing participants to fully replicate the model with their own code. Reference solutions can be downloaded for compari­ son purposes. Alternatively, the simulation result then can be uploaded to the server, which will calculate and display the time-frequency misfits between selected solu­ tions (Kristekova et al. [2006]; see also the SPICE code library). The source-imaging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
150
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
150
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We perform a time-frequency analysis of the elastic and viscoelastic solutions using the definitions of Kristekova Phase and envelope misfits for the homogeneous case and for a randomly chosen receiver in the 3D heterogeneous case et al [12]. This allows us to completely separate phase misfits from envelope misfits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform a time-frequency analysis of the elastic and viscoelastic solutions using the definitions of Kristekova Phase and envelope misfits for the homogeneous case and for a randomly chosen receiver in the 3D heterogeneous case et al [12]. This allows us to completely separate phase misfits from envelope misfits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground displacements calculated by SpecFEM are differentiated in time to compare them to the velocity output of SeisSol. With respect to the results of the SE method, a seismogram difference can be quantified by the time-frequency misfit analysis introduced by Kristekova et al (2006). Here, the signals are decomposed in the time-frequency plane to characterize the difference by separation of phase and envelope misfits.…”
Section: Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative comparison of misfits is also provided in Table 4. Envelope and phase misfits are checked based on misfit criteria, 8) which accounts for wavelength time and fre-quency information. The obtained envelope and phase misfit values are less than 5% and 1%, respectively; these results verify the accuracy of the simulation tool for application to fault-structure system analysis.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%