2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 2: Screw resistance test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paths for super floss passage were created to facilitate hygiene. The fit of the prosthesis was evaluated on the control model and intraorally using the Sheffield and screw resistance tests using a TFW device measuring the screw‐rotation angle indicating the passive fit 11 . Slight occlusal surface modifications were done, and the prosthesis was delivered (Figure 11).…”
Section: Clinical Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paths for super floss passage were created to facilitate hygiene. The fit of the prosthesis was evaluated on the control model and intraorally using the Sheffield and screw resistance tests using a TFW device measuring the screw‐rotation angle indicating the passive fit 11 . Slight occlusal surface modifications were done, and the prosthesis was delivered (Figure 11).…”
Section: Clinical Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This multifaceted interrelation has been illustrated in recent clinical research 6 where design features of the prosthesis emergence profile have been linked with mucositis, 7 peri-implantitis, 8,9,10 recession 11 or increased marginal bone loss. 12,13 Furthermore, the choice of the components which constitute critical parts of the implantabutment-prosthesis complex can add to the complexity of the design features and potentially influence long-term clinical outcomes 14 through both biological and technical complications, events which are often interrelated. 15 The aim of this review is to summarise the evidence on the importance of the prosthetic design features for the long-term health of the peri-implant tissue, review how these features can be clinically assessed, and discuss respective clinical recommendations to support decision-making and appropriate design of the implant therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%