2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01725-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misidentification of Listeria monocytogenes by the Vitek 2 System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; De Lappe et al . ; Day and Basavanna ). Molecular techniques, such as real‐time PCR, have been employed to detect L. monocytogenes in various fruits including apples, grapes, cantaloupe, mango, strawberries and oranges which achieve high sensitivities but require multiple days of enrichment (Shearer et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; De Lappe et al . ; Day and Basavanna ). Molecular techniques, such as real‐time PCR, have been employed to detect L. monocytogenes in various fruits including apples, grapes, cantaloupe, mango, strawberries and oranges which achieve high sensitivities but require multiple days of enrichment (Shearer et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous immunological techniques used for L. monocytogenes detection in foods (ELISA, fibre-optic immune-sensors, magnetic bead-antibody conjugates) have been limited due to low sensitivity, misidentifications, prolonged detection times or susceptibility to false-positive results (Geng et al 2004;Johnson et al 2013;De Lappe et al 2014;Day and Basavanna 2015). Molecular techniques, such as real-time PCR, have been employed to detect L. monocytogenes in various fruits including apples, grapes, cantaloupe, mango, strawberries and oranges which achieve high sensitivities but require multiple days of enrichment (Shearer et al 2001;Badosa et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was recently shown to be inaccurate in 1.4 % of cases seen due to atypical L. monocytogenes isolates which were negative for a phospholipase C reaction. According to the Vitek 2 method, these isolates were identifi ed as L. innocua but were later confi rmed as L. monocytogenes by PCR identifi cation methods (De Lappe et al 2014 ). Differentiation of L. monocytogenes as distinct from other Listeria species has also been seen to be possible through phage typing.…”
Section: Confi Rmation Of Isolates As L Monocytogenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may not be distinguished using conventional techniques such as selective and differential media and standard biochemical tests for differentiation of L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, L. ivanovii and L. seeligeri strains that show similar results to L. monocytogenes in these tests (10,11). It was found that 1.4% of L. monocytogenes isolates were misidentified as L. innocua using Vitek 2 (12). Therefore, Listeria spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Listeria spp. confirmation must be performed by molecular methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing (12,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%