1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199704)17:4<375::aid-pd55>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misinterpretation of Trisomy 18 as a Pseudomosaicism at Third-Trimester Amniocentesis of a Child With a Mosaic 46,xy/47,xy,+3/48,xxy,+18 Karyotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both extra chromosomes in all of 10 cases of double trisomy were of maternal origin. While some cases of mosaicism including double trisomy were reported (Van Ravenswaaij‐Arts et al . 1997; Devriendt et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both extra chromosomes in all of 10 cases of double trisomy were of maternal origin. While some cases of mosaicism including double trisomy were reported (Van Ravenswaaij‐Arts et al . 1997; Devriendt et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article entitled 'Misinterpretation of trisomy 18 as a pseudomosaic at third-trimester amniocentesis of a child with a mosaic 46,XY/47,XY,+3/ 48,XXY,+18 karyotype' by Van Ravenswaaij-Arts et al (1997) is misleading. A number of issues regarding reporting and interpretation of the cytogenetic data and appropriate follow-up warrant further discussion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%