2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.132403399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mismatch-targeted transposition of Mu: A new strategy to map genetic polymorphism

Abstract: Phage Mu DNA transposes to duplex target DNA sites with limited sequence specificity. Here we demonstrate that Mu transposition exhibits a strong target site preference for all single-nucleotide mismatches. This finding has implications for the mechanism of transposition and provides a powerful tool for genomic research. A single mismatch could be detected as a preferred target of Mu transposition in the presence of 300,000-fold excess of nonmismatched sites. We demonstrate the detection of both heterozygous a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7B)? Although MuA lacks sequence specificity, it is known to display a great preference for insertion in mismatch sites on the DNA (45). There is no physiological reason for such preference other than that the mismatch DNA would readily assume a deformed DNA structure, which is favored for the strand-transfer reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7B)? Although MuA lacks sequence specificity, it is known to display a great preference for insertion in mismatch sites on the DNA (45). There is no physiological reason for such preference other than that the mismatch DNA would readily assume a deformed DNA structure, which is favored for the strand-transfer reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One added benefit might be that higher supercoiling levels lead to rapid curing once E. coli is lysogenized by a prophage. Recent work shows that Mu transposition hotspots in Salmonella are different from those in E. coli (D. Manna, S. Porwollik, M. McClelland, and N. P. Higgins, submitted for publication), and lower negative supercoiling could account for different locations of unusual DNA structure that act as transposition hotspots (93). If the supercoiling set point is established by the gyrA and gyrB genes, it would be very interesting to see how Salmonella fitness and dichotomous growth rates would change after swapping the normal Salmonella gyrase alleles with E. coli gyrA and gyrB sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final reaction conditions were 100 ng of genomic DNA, 200 M each dNTP, 1.0 mM MgCl 2 , 0.66 M each primer, and 0.4 U of TaqDNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The Mu transposition reactions were previously described (Yanagihara and Mizuuchi, 2002). The Mu transpososome mixture was prepared by mixing 300 nM MuA transposase, 100 nM labeled Mu-end DNA, and 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 15% (v/v) glycerol, 15% DMSO, 10 mM 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), and 156 mM NaCl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%