Mismatches between ‘Scientific’ and ‘Non-Scientific’ Ways of Knowing and Their Contributions to Public Understanding of Science

Abstract

As differentiation within scientific disciplines increases, so does differentiation between the sciences and other ways of knowing. This distancing between 'scientific' and 'non-scientific' cultures reflects differences in what are considered valid and reliable approaches to acquiring knowledge and has played a major role in recent science-oriented controversies. Scientists' reluctance to actively engage in science communication, coupled with journalists' reliance on the norms of balance, conflict, and human interest in covering scientific issues, have combined to exacerbate public mistrust of science on issues like the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. The failure of effective communications between scientists and non-scientists has hindered the progress of both effective science and effective policy. In order to better bridge the gap between the 'scientific' and 'non-scientific' cultures, renewed efforts must be made to encourage substantive public engagement, with the ultimate goal of facilitating an open, democratic policy-making process.

Vaccination communication strategies: What have we learned, and lost, in 200 years?

“…They need to attempt to connect the emotions their audience may feel, such as fear or uncertainty about vaccine safety, to the information they provide, and genuinely attempt to address those fears without goading further negative emotional response. This perspective reinforces what the science communication literature has already demonstrated with respect to diverse issues: facts alone are not enough [Bray, France and Gilbert, 2012], there are issues of trust between scientific authorities and publics [Bauer, Allum and Miller, 2007], and factors such as beliefs and values must be considered to understand the influences on personal stances and interpretations of issues [McCall and Groark, 2007;Mikulak, 2011].…”

Learning about Climate: An Exploration of the Socialization of Climate Change

“…Journalists operate as mediators between scientific and nonscientific communities (Mikulak 2011). Yet, often they too have a nonscientific understanding of climate change (Bell 1994b).…”

Public Understanding of Plant Biology: Voices from the Bottom of the Garden

“…This has been the subject of an enormous body of work over time (e.g. Driver, Guesne & Tiberghien, 1985;Gilbert & Watts, 1983;Mikulak, 2011). A first question might be, exactly what misconceptions would a school curriculum remedy that might otherwise have surfaced (detrimentally) in later life?…”