2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misperceptions of "light" cigarettes abound: National survey data

Abstract: Background: Many smokers believe that "light" cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes, which is at variance with the scientific evidence. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) aims to address this problem in Article 11 which deals with misleading labelling of tobacco products. In this study we aimed to determine smokers' use and beliefs concerning "light" and "mild" cigarettes ("lights"), including in relation to ethnicity, deprivation and other socio-demographic characteristics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were weighted to reflect the national population of smokers in New Zealand. The multivariate analysis involved two models: a) using socio‐demographic variables (age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and financial stress); and b) adding smoking‐related beliefs and behaviours (see a previous article using this dataset for more detail on these models) 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were weighted to reflect the national population of smokers in New Zealand. The multivariate analysis involved two models: a) using socio‐demographic variables (age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and financial stress); and b) adding smoking‐related beliefs and behaviours (see a previous article using this dataset for more detail on these models) 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many WP users are driven by a misperception of reducedharm/ addictiveness, which can be re-enforced by deceptive descriptors that appear on WP tobacco packages (e.g., “contains 0% tar and 0.5% nicotine”) or accessories such as the charcoal (e.g. “smokeless and odorless”, “free of chemicals”, “100% natural”) (Khalil et al, 2009; Nakkash & Khalil, 2010; Wilson et al, 2009). All these descriptors aim to create an impression of a healthy product, and should be countered by appropriate packaging and advertisement policies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that many smokers mistakenly believe that cigarettes labeled as “light” or “mild” actually deliver less tar and are less harmful to smokers, and consequently are “healthier” than regular cigarettes [14,15]. Although Brazil banned the use of these misleading descriptors in 2001, a number of brands use alternative terms such as “fresh” or references to lighter colors such as “gold” or “silver” [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%