Misreporting Month of Birth: Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries

Abstract

A large literature has used children’s birthdays to identify exposure to shocks and estimate their impacts on later outcomes. Using height-for-age z scores (HAZ) for more than 990,000 children in 62 countries from 163 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), we show how random errors in birth dates create artifacts in HAZ that can be used to diagnose the extent of age misreporting. The most important artifact is an upward gradient in HAZ by recorded month of birth (MOB) from start to end of calendar years, resulting in a large HAZ differential between December- and January-born children of –0.32 HAZ points. We observe a second artifact associated with round ages, with a downward gradient in HAZ by recorded age in months, and then an upward step after reaching ages 2, 3, and 4. These artifacts have previously been interpreted as actual health shocks. We show that they are not related to agroclimatic conditions but are instead linked to the type of calendar used and arise mainly when enumerators do not see the child’s birth registration cards. We explain the size of the December–January gap through simulation in which 11 % of children have their birth date replaced by a random month. We find a minor impact on the average stunting rate but a larger impact in specific error-prone surveys. We further show how misreporting MOB causes attenuation bias when MOB is used for identification of shock exposure as well as systematic bias in the impact on HAZ of events that occur early or late in each calendar year. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s13524-018-0753-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Characterizing the contribution of high temperatures to child undernourishment in Sub-Saharan Africa

“… is a vector of child-specific controls, including mother’s education, mother’s age and child birth order interacted with child sex, birth month as well as precipitation in the month of interview as well as cumulative precipitation over the previous year. Birth month is included in our controls as it is likely correlated with seasonal drivers 61 , though recall issues have been found for this variable 62 . In general, recall issues on timing of birth may add noise to our lifetime exposure findings.…”

Measurement Error Mechanisms Matter: Agricultural Intensification with Farmer Misperceptions and Misreporting

“…The mechanism(s) generating measurement error in survey data nonetheless matter to econometric inference on a wide range of issues. For example, parents may know and act in accord with the exact age of their child and knowingly misreport a simple, rounded number -e.g., 2 years, rather than, say, 20 months -with important consequences for inferences about child anthropometric status (Larsen, Headey and Masters, 2019). Or perhaps they do not know the child's true age, with potential consequences for medication dosing and growth monitoring.…”

“…In this paper we propose three distinct data generating processes behind measurement error in farmer-reported plot size and analytically derive the biases these imply for agricultural intensification parameter estimates. The first data generating process assumes that farmers know their plot size, but misreport it when surveyed, just as a parent might know her child's true age but round the value when responding to survey enumerators (Larsen, Headey and Masters, 2019). Measurement error might follow a simple regression to the mean pattern (Carletto, Gourlay and Winters, 2015), or a focal point bunching process, or one where respondents report their best (but almost surely inaccurate) predictions of the true regressor value (Hyslop and Imbens, 2001).…”

Agriculture and undernutrition through the lens of economics

“…The specific kind of shock most often investigated are seasonal fluctuations in rainfall and temperature around the time of a child's birth, which is much more closely linked to attained height for children in poorer, more remote places than in towns and cities. Some of the apparent link between month of birth and height for age is due to random errors in recorded birth months among children without birth registrations (Larsen, et al, 2019), but even after adjusting for those errors there is significant variation in attained height by season of birth (Finaret and Masters, 2019). Research to date has shown how sanitation, food markets and local infrastructure can help households protect their children from seasonal climate fluctuations (Mulmi, et al, 2016, Shively, 2017, Thapa and Shively, 2018, leading to new work focusing on specific kinds of smoothing such as year-round access to a nutritious diet (Headey, et al (2017d), (bai, et al, 2019).…”