2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00642.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miss, What's My Name? New teacher identity as a question of reciprocal ontological security

Abstract: This paper extends the dialogue of educational philosophy to the experience of beginners entering the teaching profession. Rather than impose the ideas of any specific philosopher or theorist, or indeed official standard, the exploration presented here owes its origins to phenomenology and the use of grounded theory. Working from a narrative data base and focussing on the knowing of name in the first instance, the authors develop their emergent ideas on self and identity in relation to children taught, through… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stereotypically, teachers are believed to focus on practice rather than theory; ideology, as working theory, bridges the theory/practice dichotomy. Eclecticism refers to “blending the hunches of the experienced practitioner within different discourses, drawing on a range of theoretical and philosophical perspectives, rather than prematurely impose any single view” (McNally & Blake, 2012, p. 209). Thus, although eclecticism is not associated with any particular learning theory or ideological orientation, it does not mean that such theories or orientations do not influence instructional decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stereotypically, teachers are believed to focus on practice rather than theory; ideology, as working theory, bridges the theory/practice dichotomy. Eclecticism refers to “blending the hunches of the experienced practitioner within different discourses, drawing on a range of theoretical and philosophical perspectives, rather than prematurely impose any single view” (McNally & Blake, 2012, p. 209). Thus, although eclecticism is not associated with any particular learning theory or ideological orientation, it does not mean that such theories or orientations do not influence instructional decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are linear, rational humanism, developmental ideology, holism, laissez-faire, meliorism, critical theory, religious orthodoxy, progressivism, vocational ideology, home-project, reconceptualism, and cognitive pluralism (Eisner, 1992, 2003; Kliebard, 1992, 2004; Miller, 2011). Such ideological choices suggest educators as eclectic in addressing the unique needs and values of students (Feldhusen, 1994; McNally & Blake, 2012). Of particular concern in this study are the needs and values of gifted and talented (GT) students.…”
Section: Curriculum Theory Ideologies and Eclecticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a close connection between the two, perhaps especially in the teaching profession, a profession often considered as 'what you are, more than what you do' (Goodson, 2003;D. H. Hargreaves, 1980;McNally & Blake, 2012;Messina, 2012;Nieto, 2003Nieto, , 2005. In reference to the above sources, the role of a teacher is often considered something more than a profession, with additional roles as father, friend and model (Allen, 2006, p. 125).…”
Section: Theoretical Anchoringmentioning
confidence: 99%