2016
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-216241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missed appendicitis: did unexpected intraluminal densities play a role?

Abstract: A healthy 19-year-old boy presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain. His history, examination and laboratory evaluation raised concern for appendicitis. A CT study of the abdomen and pelvis was carried out by the radiologist and emergency physician and was notable only for a large amount of unexpected high-attenuation intraluminal material. With further history, this was thought to be most likely retained bismuth from over-the-counter medicine ingestion. The patient was discharged home without … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been instances where radio-dense medications have been misinterpreted as GI fistulas, urinary tract stones, or pancreatic calcifications [14][15][16]. There have also been instances where the presence of such pills distracts from other abnormalities responsible for the true reason for a patient's complaints [17]. In our case, the patient had an initial presentation of abdominal pain with imaging showing radio-dense objects, prompting the suspicion that such objects were the cause of the patient's complaint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been instances where radio-dense medications have been misinterpreted as GI fistulas, urinary tract stones, or pancreatic calcifications [14][15][16]. There have also been instances where the presence of such pills distracts from other abnormalities responsible for the true reason for a patient's complaints [17]. In our case, the patient had an initial presentation of abdominal pain with imaging showing radio-dense objects, prompting the suspicion that such objects were the cause of the patient's complaint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%