2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missed appointments at a Swiss university outpatient clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
31
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Delays greater than 90 days, however, are not associated with an increase in risk of missing in this group. We hypothesize that appointments scheduled after such a delay are most probably taken for a new reason for consultation that, similarly to what has been described in adults [31], adolescents would be less likely to miss. That is not always the case for follow-up appointments, which are probably mostly purposed by the provider, as patients may feel the follow-up appointments more frequently unnecessary than the providers, similarly to what has been reported by Wick et al [32] in a study conducted in general practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Delays greater than 90 days, however, are not associated with an increase in risk of missing in this group. We hypothesize that appointments scheduled after such a delay are most probably taken for a new reason for consultation that, similarly to what has been described in adults [31], adolescents would be less likely to miss. That is not always the case for follow-up appointments, which are probably mostly purposed by the provider, as patients may feel the follow-up appointments more frequently unnecessary than the providers, similarly to what has been reported by Wick et al [32] in a study conducted in general practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Lehmann et al [14] in a Swiss clinic found 206 of 1.296 appointments have not been met. Okotie et al [21] investigated 226 urological outpatients, 63.2% were punctual and 14.8% never came.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[3][4][5][6] Studies of single missed appointments have produced conflicting results when it comes to designing effective interventions that can increase attendance. [7][8][9][10] This may be due to a reliance on small samples in disparate settings [11][12][13][14][15] and conflation of patients who occasionally miss appointments with patients who have an established pattern of missing many.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%