2018
DOI: 10.17159/2309-9585/2018/v44a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing and Missed: Rehumanisation, the Nation and Missing-ness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Ciraj Rassool has argued that the objects that travelled to institutions along with human remains might be thought of as deeply connected with those human remains and therefore in themselves ancestors. 5 In Potential History, Azoulay offers a critique of the canon of history as a mode for studying the processes of looting and dispossession. Her argument that we recognise the legacies of imperialism manifest in the discipline of history is important, as is her critique of the ways in which history periodises and historicises the world, separating past from present and objects from people.…”
Section: Kronos 46mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Ciraj Rassool has argued that the objects that travelled to institutions along with human remains might be thought of as deeply connected with those human remains and therefore in themselves ancestors. 5 In Potential History, Azoulay offers a critique of the canon of history as a mode for studying the processes of looting and dispossession. Her argument that we recognise the legacies of imperialism manifest in the discipline of history is important, as is her critique of the ways in which history periodises and historicises the world, separating past from present and objects from people.…”
Section: Kronos 46mentioning
confidence: 99%