2017
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s129785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research

Abstract: Missing data are ubiquitous in clinical epidemiological research. Individuals with missing data may differ from those with no missing data in terms of the outcome of interest and prognosis in general. Missing data are often categorized into the following three types: missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR), and missing not at random (MNAR). In clinical epidemiological research, missing data are seldom MCAR. Missing data can constitute considerable challenges in the analyses and interpretat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
555
2
17

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 681 publications
(579 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
555
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Allowed responses to survey questions included ‘don’t know’ but occasionally residents refused to answer particular questions. To avoid a sizeable loss of respondents due to missing data as a result of not knowing the answer in several survey responses, notably with 54 (21%) of individuals not knowing the household income, we used a combination of simple and multiple imputation 16. Household income was imputed using the most common response of others in the same household, if possible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Allowed responses to survey questions included ‘don’t know’ but occasionally residents refused to answer particular questions. To avoid a sizeable loss of respondents due to missing data as a result of not knowing the answer in several survey responses, notably with 54 (21%) of individuals not knowing the household income, we used a combination of simple and multiple imputation 16. Household income was imputed using the most common response of others in the same household, if possible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, we used multiple imputation to create and analyse imputed data sets (m=20). This is thought to be a scientifically sound approach to analyses with missing data16 if the mechanisms and assumptions are approximately true. Our imputation model included all variables described in the analysis model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We addressed missing data by the missing indicator method, which involves grouping missing values into a ‘missing’ category 34. In particular, data on education were incomplete, as it was not systematically registered before 1973.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity analyses using marginal structural models and a disease risk score analysis diminished the possibility of residual and time dependent confounding due to the long follow-up period 10. Multiple imputation11 also suggested that missing data had little impact on the observed associations. A frequent limitation of pharmacoepidemiology studies is the potential for confounding by indication 12.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%