1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1997.596072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing data techniques for robust speech recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The missing data approach assumes that some acoustic data in the mixture will remain uncorrupted and can be identified as reliable evidence for recognition. Cooke et al (1997) demonstrated that recognition can indeed be based on a small amount (10% or less) of the original time-frequency 'pixels' if they can be correctly identified.…”
Section: Linking Casa With Speech Recognition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The missing data approach assumes that some acoustic data in the mixture will remain uncorrupted and can be identified as reliable evidence for recognition. Cooke et al (1997) demonstrated that recognition can indeed be based on a small amount (10% or less) of the original time-frequency 'pixels' if they can be correctly identified.…”
Section: Linking Casa With Speech Recognition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach is known as the marginalisation approach and, in brief, it basically involves modifying the computation of the observation probabilities in the recogniser to take into account the missing information [7,8]. The second approach, known as imputation, involves "filling in" the missing information in the noisy spectrum before speech recognition actually happens [16,20,36,37,42].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Missing-data Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next turn to missing feature techniques, which can be used to model feature distortion due to a front-end enhancement process [7], noise [49], or reverberation [50].…”
Section: Missing Feature Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%