2013
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2013.773419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing: evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education

Abstract: Abstract:As technology is increasingly being used for teaching and learning in higher education, it is important to scrutinise what tangible educational gains are being attained. Are claims about technology transforming learning and teaching in higher education borne out by actual practices? This paper draws upon a critical analysis of recent research literature concerning Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL). It argues that few published accounts of TEL practices show evidence of a scholarly approach to univers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Their story is important because lecturers are critical in relation to making changes in pedagogy (CLEX 2009;Rebbeck and Ecclesfield 2010;Kirkwood and Price 2013) and as Steel (2009) notes lecturers' beliefs are crucial in determining their behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their story is important because lecturers are critical in relation to making changes in pedagogy (CLEX 2009;Rebbeck and Ecclesfield 2010;Kirkwood and Price 2013) and as Steel (2009) notes lecturers' beliefs are crucial in determining their behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical defining feature of Web 2.0 tools and services is that they allow participation and collaboration in knowledge building and sharing activities over the web and thus they have the potential for a democratic and participative style of teaching and learning. Crook (2008), CLEX (2009), Conole and Alevizou (2010) and Kirkwood and Price (2013) provide a detailed analysis of the role and challenges for teaching using these tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not uncommon in ET for greater attention to be given to the technology and its implementation than its impact upon student learning (Kirkwood & Price, 2013b). However a fundamental question remains as to whether the increased time spent on implementing ET is benefiting student learning and not wasting their time, or the time that their teachers have invested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of practices, Kirkwood and Price (2013) suggest digital tools can be used, not just to replicate and supplement existing approaches to learning and teaching, but to transform learning and teaching. Sharpe and Beetham (P. 174, 2010) have also touched upon this transformation; suggesting that digital creation is not simply replicating writing in a digital context, but that "new technologies are changing the nature of learning and knowledge" by expanding the traditional academic form of creationwriting -into other digital media (Sharpe & Beetham, 2010, p.166).…”
Section: Digital Literacies Should Be Transformationalmentioning
confidence: 99%