2015
DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2015.6.1.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing Pathways to Self-Governance: Aboriginal Health Policy in British Columbia

Abstract: This article explores how current policy shifts in British Columbia, Canada highlight an important gap in Canadian self-government discussions to date. The analysis presented draws on insights gained from a larger study that explored the policy contexts influencing the evolving roles of two long-standing urban Aboriginal health centres in British Columbia. We apply a policy framework to analyze current discussions occurring in British Columbia and contrast these with Ontario, Canada and the New Zealand Māori h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These arrangements are only available to discrete First Nations and Quebec/Labrador Inuit communities, while services for Métis and Aboriginal people living in urban areas are provided by mainstream organizations, with few urban Aboriginal health clinics available. Some of these services are resourced through relational contracts, while others depend on a collection of classical contracts (Lavoie et al 2013). More research is needed to map funding and accountability pathways off-reserve.…”
Section: Integrated Contracting With Exclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These arrangements are only available to discrete First Nations and Quebec/Labrador Inuit communities, while services for Métis and Aboriginal people living in urban areas are provided by mainstream organizations, with few urban Aboriginal health clinics available. Some of these services are resourced through relational contracts, while others depend on a collection of classical contracts (Lavoie et al 2013). More research is needed to map funding and accountability pathways off-reserve.…”
Section: Integrated Contracting With Exclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we agree that CHCs could possibly be government agencies, the CHCs with which we worked emerged as a result of government services’ failure to meet the needs of vulnerable populations [ 3 – 5 ]. A key component of the success of CHCs in meeting needs has been attributed to their community-grounded governance structure, which ensures pathways for community feedback on the performance of the CHCs and their programs to meet community needs [ 6 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The push for smaller government and interest in harnessing competition among providers to stimulate innovation can act as an added incentive for governments to transfer healthcare responsibilities onto the NGO sector [ 19 ]. In other cases, however, CHCs surface primarily in urban areas where surplus capacity (underemployed community-engaged professionals) exists and where unmet needs persist [ 5 ], to complement services provided by for-profit providers (providers in private practice) and governmental not-for-profit providers. Although histories vary, in either case, these CHCs generally emerge as a result of social activism, to meet the unique, and unmet or poorly met, healthcare needs of marginalized populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First Nations' perspectives on health were absent from the design and delivery of First Nations' health services, which were guided by the Indian Act and controlled by distant federal government offices with little or no insight into the health needs of the communities they served (Abele and Prince, 2006;Lavoie et al, 2010). Over the last decade, a transformation process has been underway to reincorporate First Nations perspectives and decision making into the design and delivery of health services (Lavoie et al, 2015). A hallmark of this journey of transformation, and the focus of this paper, is the creation of partnerships for change within the broader health system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%