Missing stellar mass in SED fitting: spatially unresolved photometry can underestimate galaxy masses

Abstract

We fit model spectral energy distributions to each pixel in 67 nearby (<z>= 0.0057) galaxies using broadband photometry from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and GALEX. For each galaxy, we compare the stellar mass derived by summing the mass of each pixel to that found from fitting the entire galaxy treated as an unresolved point source. We find that, while the pixel-by-pixel and unresolved masses of galaxies with low specific star formation rates (such as ellipticals and lenticulars) are in rough agreement, the unresolved mass estimate for star-forming galaxies is systematically lower then the measurement from spatially-resolved photometry. The discrepancy is strongly correlated with sSFR, with the highest sSFRs in our sample having masses underestimated by 25% (0.12 dex) when treated as point sources. We found a simple relation to statistically correct mass estimates derived from unresolved broad-band SED fitting to the resolved mass estimates: m resolved = m unresolved /(−0.057 log (sSF R) + 0.34) where sSFR is in units of yr −1 . We study the effect of varying spatial resolution by degrading the image resolution of the largest images and find a sharp decrease in the pixel-bypixel mass estimate at a physical scale of approximately 3 kpc, which is comparable to spiral arm widths. The effects we observe are consistent with the "outshining" idea which posits that the youngest stellar populations mask more massive, older -and thus fainter -stellar populations. Although the presence of strong dust lanes can also lead to a drastic difference between resolved and unresolved mass estimates (up to 45% or 0.3 dex) for any individual galaxy, we found that resolving dust does not affect mass estimates on average. The strong correlation between mass discrepancy and sSFR is thus most likely due to the outshining systematic bias.

Understanding the scatter in the spatially resolved star formation main sequence of local massive spiral galaxies

“…We apply a method so called "pixel-to-pixel SED fitting" (e.g., Abraham et al 1999;Welikala et al 2008;Zibetti et al 2009;Wuyts et al 2012;Sorba & Sawicki 2015) to derive Σ * and Σ SFR in each region of a galaxy. This method can be divided into three main steps; (1) PSF matching, image registration, and binning to obtain 7 bands photometric flux in each bin of a galaxy, (2) construction of model photometric SEDs, and (3) fitting the set of model photometric SEDs to the 7 band photometric flux.…”

NIBLES: an H I census of stellar mass selected SDSS galaxies

“…We do not have a simple way of estimating the systematic uncertainties between the two stellar mass estimate methods as stellar masses for individual galaxies are not given in Papastergis et al (2012). We will therefore ignore this uncertainty, but we note that in our experience different mass estimates usually agree within about 0.3 dex (e.g., Drory et al 2004;Moustakas et al 2013;Sorba & Sawicki 2015).…”

Galex–sdss–wise Legacy Catalog (Gswlc): Star Formation Rates, Stellar Masses, and Dust Attenuations of 700,000 Low-Redshift Galaxies

“…The critical difference between the delayed exponential and our implementation of the two-component exponential SF history is that in the latter the old component starts in the early universe, whereas the delayed exponential, having a single peak, will be shifted toward later epochs. Recently, Sorba & Sawicki (2015) have reported that the masses of nearby highsSFR galaxies obtained by summing up the masses in individual "pixels" are up to 0.1 dex higher than the masses from integrated light. They proposed that the difference arose from "outshining" of the old, fainter populations in galaxies with younger populations (high sSFR).…”