Missing voices in GRI standards? Distinct material concerns of Latin American stakeholders revealed by COVID-19

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the extent to which global reporting initiative (GRI) standards reflect the material concerns of stakeholders in developing countries, with particular reference to Latin America.Design/methodology/approachThe main dataset was a sample of 120 media articles that discussed corporate conduct related to COVID-19 from both developing (Chile, Mexico and Peru) and developed (Australia, UK and the USA) countries. Concerns evident from those articles were compared and then mapped to applicable GRI standards to identify relevant disclosures and gaps. Findings were triangulated by drawing on two additional datasets: Latin American GRI-related academic literature (in Spanish) and submissions to GRI standards.FindingsMedia analysis reveals significant differences between developing and developed country concerns, as well as gaps in GRI disclosure requirements in relation to customers, labour standards and corporate interactions with non-government organisations and governments. Analysis of Latin American literature corroborates the concerns raised in media articles regarding employment. Additionally, it points out country-specific issues and calls for increased reporting of corruption. Analysis of the GRI standards development process reveals marked underrepresentation of developing countries, which may contribute to the observed deficiencies in the GRI standards.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the (surprisingly rare) research concerning the quality of GRI standards and responds to calls for greater attention to developing countries in the SEA literature by showing that GRI standards may not fully meet the needs of users in the developing country context of Latin America. The paper also contributes to practice via specific recommendations for improvement to GRI standards and the standard-setting process and provides a summary of the key findings from Spanish-language Latin American literature.

Flattening or addressing complexity? The future role of GRI in light of the sustainability accounting (r)evolution

“…Finally, GRI’s theoretical competencies could be at the service of developing measures that are consistent with the context in which they are to be implemented, considering the existence of hybrid organizations and forms of participatory governance that are widespread in different settings (Costa et al , 2022; Vakkuri and Johanson, 2020). In this vein, Journeault et al (2021) and Hazelton et al (2022) emphasize that the GRI standards were formulated in the context of developed economies, particularly Western countries. Multicultural issues, often related to the existence of non-capitalistic hybrid organizations, should also be subject to careful consideration in future GRI endeavors addressing complexity.…”