2008
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mississippi Delta subsidence primarily caused by compaction of Holocene strata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
334
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 452 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
334
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These figures are of the same order of magnitude as estimates of subsidence due to sediment loading at the Mississippi Delta (Yu et al, 2012). The additional 0.6 - 1.0 mm yr --1 subsidence required to match the Copper River Delta observations (RSL 3 ) is in line with estimates of estuarine sediment compaction rates from the UK (Horton and Shennan, 2009) and substantially less than millennial--scale compaction rates of 5 mm yr --1 inferred from the Mississippi Delta (Törnqvist et al, 2008). With a more detailed ground survey of the elevation of the sill than currently available, we could further refine our estimates of the relative contributions of sediment loading and sediment compaction through the age of the ingression.…”
Section: Different Combinations Of Process--responses Between Sitessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These figures are of the same order of magnitude as estimates of subsidence due to sediment loading at the Mississippi Delta (Yu et al, 2012). The additional 0.6 - 1.0 mm yr --1 subsidence required to match the Copper River Delta observations (RSL 3 ) is in line with estimates of estuarine sediment compaction rates from the UK (Horton and Shennan, 2009) and substantially less than millennial--scale compaction rates of 5 mm yr --1 inferred from the Mississippi Delta (Törnqvist et al, 2008). With a more detailed ground survey of the elevation of the sill than currently available, we could further refine our estimates of the relative contributions of sediment loading and sediment compaction through the age of the ingression.…”
Section: Different Combinations Of Process--responses Between Sitessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In degrading deltas, enhanced compaction in organic-rich overbank areas [Törnqvist et al, 2008] may result in more fractal shorelines as non-channel areas subside below sea level, while in wave-dominated deltas diffusive dampening of the channelbifurcation instability [Jerolmack and Swenson, 2007] could result in non-fractal channel patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processes such as tectonic subsidence, natural compaction, and artificial settlement do not account for more than a few mm/year of subsidence (2-5 mm/year [32,36]). Additionally, natural subsidence occurs uniformly over large areas with consistent sediment deposits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%