2013
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.736903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misspecification Testing in a Class of Conditional Distributional Models

Abstract: We propose a specification test for a wide range of parametric models for conditional distribution function of an outcome variable given a vector of covariates.The test is based on the Cramer-von Mises distance between an unrestricted estimate of the joint distribution function of the data, and an restricted estimate that imposes the structure implied by the model. The procedure is straightforward to implement, is consistent against fixed alternatives, has non-trivial power against local deviations from the nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our test, their test has a slower rate of convergence, cannot distinguish Pittman local alternatives and depends on bandwidth selection procedures, which might be impractical. Our test is close in spirit to the empirical process based goodness‐of‐fit tests of H 0 by Andrews (), Rothe and Wied () and Delgado and Stute (); however, their results require i.i.d. data, while our test not only can be applied to time series, but also is able to detect misspecification in dynamic structure.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In contrast to our test, their test has a slower rate of convergence, cannot distinguish Pittman local alternatives and depends on bandwidth selection procedures, which might be impractical. Our test is close in spirit to the empirical process based goodness‐of‐fit tests of H 0 by Andrews (), Rothe and Wied () and Delgado and Stute (); however, their results require i.i.d. data, while our test not only can be applied to time series, but also is able to detect misspecification in dynamic structure.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Given our focus on the bottom of the wage distribution, this aspect is rather critical. Although the two approaches are theoretically equivalent (Koenker et al, 2013), empirical evidence suggests that DR generally provides a better fit to wage distribution data than quantile regression (Rothe and Wied, 2013;Van Kerm et al, 2016).…”
Section: Distributional Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit distribution and bootstrap consistency results in Corollaries 5.3 and 5.4 are new. They have already been applied in several studies (Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val, and Kowalski (2011), Rothe (2012), and Rothe and Wied (2012)). Note that unlike Theorem 5.2 and Corollary 5.4, Corollary 5.3 does not rely on compactness of the region Y j X j .…”
Section: Inference Theory For Counterfactual Estimators Based On Distmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rothe and Wied (2012) proposed new specification tests for conditional distribution models. Applying their tests to a similar data set, they rejected the quantile regression model, but not the distribution regression model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%