2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315695624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misunderstanding the Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
66
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The view of the contemporary world as composed of passive and isolated individuals who are subject to the 'effects' of powerful propaganda messages has long been considered obsolete in communications research. While early debates about the power of audiences to resist media messages focused on the polysemy of the text (Morley, 1980;Hall, 1981), in the digital environment, conceptions of the 'audience' are being redrawn to reflect the greater potential for participation in public life (Jenkins 2006;Mossberger et al 2008) and the more 'interactive' relationship individuals have with the range of media at their disposal (Bruns, 2009;Poster, 2009) However, as Curran and others note in Britain, in spite of the potential offered by digital media, there is currently no demand for significant political or cultural change (Curran et al 2012), and strong evidence for the continuing role of the mass media in shaping public understanding (Davis, 2006;Philo and Berry, 2011;Briant et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The view of the contemporary world as composed of passive and isolated individuals who are subject to the 'effects' of powerful propaganda messages has long been considered obsolete in communications research. While early debates about the power of audiences to resist media messages focused on the polysemy of the text (Morley, 1980;Hall, 1981), in the digital environment, conceptions of the 'audience' are being redrawn to reflect the greater potential for participation in public life (Jenkins 2006;Mossberger et al 2008) and the more 'interactive' relationship individuals have with the range of media at their disposal (Bruns, 2009;Poster, 2009) However, as Curran and others note in Britain, in spite of the potential offered by digital media, there is currently no demand for significant political or cultural change (Curran et al 2012), and strong evidence for the continuing role of the mass media in shaping public understanding (Davis, 2006;Philo and Berry, 2011;Briant et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ta revolucija, je međutim, individualna, i zavisi od prethodnog obrazovanja, sklonosti i radoznalosti pojedinca, ali i društvenog konteksta u kome pojedinac živi (Curran, Fenton, i Freedman, 2012).…”
Section: Novi Posredniciunclassified
“…Fejsbuk omogućava i kontrolisane lične odnose s javnošću, što uveliko koriste preduzeća i javne ličnosti, slično kao i na tviteru (Twitter), za stvaranje i povećavanje lične popularnosti, i tako nudi i veće mogućnosti za odnose s javnošću nego tradicionalni mediji, na kojima pojedinci ili organizacije imaju manje kontrole nad svojom "slikom". Upitno je, međutim, koliko je fejsbuk sredstvo za razvijanje društvenosti, stvaranje funkcionalnih veza i zajednica, emancipaciju građana, te pozitivne društvene promjene (Curran, Fenton, i Freedman, 2012). Ali da je odlična platforma za velike korporacije i ličnu promociju gotovo da je neupitno.…”
Section: Novi Posredniciunclassified
“…Some of these concern studies which analyze macro-level phenomena such as the digital divide (Guillén & Suárez, 2005;Norris, 2001;Notten, Peter, Kraaykamp, & Valkenburg, 2009); others focus on specific topics such as online safety (e.g., EU Kids Online: Livingstone, Kirwil, Ponte, & Staksrud, 2014;Lobe, Livingstone, Ólafsson, & Vodeb, 2011;Notten & Nikken, 2016) or the diffusion of internet jokes (Shifman, Levy, & Thelwall, 2014). Yet one of the core intrinsic properties that internet theorists have distinguished, the ability to increase democracy and 'global understanding' through its connectivity has hardly been empirically studied (Curran, Fenton, & Freedman, 2012;Zuckerman, 2013). One notable exception is the research by Norris and Inglehart Cosmopolitanism and openness toward foreign culture…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%