1961
DOI: 10.1080/00222936108651166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mites from the nests of the Mole-rat (Spalax ehrenbergi) in Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…n. exist as Berlese (1892) originally showed the anal shield not separated, but later Berlese (1904) illustrated the species with a separate anal shield. Costa (1962) and Hunter (1967) regarded the species as having a separate anal shield, and here we confirm this by checking the type specimens of Pogonolaelaps canestrinii comb. n. kindly examined by Dr. Roberto Nanelli, and the type information is as follows:…”
Section: Systematicssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…n. exist as Berlese (1892) originally showed the anal shield not separated, but later Berlese (1904) illustrated the species with a separate anal shield. Costa (1962) and Hunter (1967) regarded the species as having a separate anal shield, and here we confirm this by checking the type specimens of Pogonolaelaps canestrinii comb. n. kindly examined by Dr. Roberto Nanelli, and the type information is as follows:…”
Section: Systematicssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…— Vitzthum 1929: 25; Sellnick 1931: 695; Costa 1962: 491: Costa 1966: 74; Bhattacharyya 1968: 539; Joharchi et al 2011: 23.…”
Section: Systematicsunclassified
“…The 1904 re-description is only a misidentification of the 1892 species. Costa (1962) re-described and illustrated a species he called Gymnolaelaps canestrinii (Berlese, 1903), but he did not mention Laelaps canestrinii Berlese, 1892. Costa was wrong about this species because only the 1892 description and illustrations refer to the true species of canestrinii .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costa was wrong about this species because only the 1892 description and illustrations refer to the true species of canestrinii . Therefore Laelaps canestrinii sensu Berlese (1903), (1904) and Costa (1962) does not have a name. Therefore, we rename this species as Laelaspisella berlesei Joharchi, nom.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation