Mitigating climate change: A role for regulations and risk‐taking

Abstract

Why do some firms engage in actions to reduce climate change? We propose two counterintuitive mechanisms: high levels of regulation and a firm's increased tolerance for risk. Drawing from insights on how institutional contexts constrain, and enable, prosocial firm behavior, we argue that external pressures, amplified internally by a firm's higher tolerance for risk, increase the likelihood that a greenhouse gas (GHG)-intensive firm will engage in climate change actions that exceed regulatory requirements. An analysis based on 7,101 observations of U.S. publicly traded firms during the 2013 to 2015 period supports our hypotheses. Our models show high overall prediction accuracy (88.6%) using an out-of-time holdout sample from 2016. Moreover, we find that firms that have exhibited environmental wrongdoing are also more likely to engage in beyond-compliance activities, which may be a form of greenwashing. Thus, more formal and informal regulatory oversight has the potential to spur positive environmental actions. This has implications for a firm's corporate social responsibility actions as well as for climate change regulatory policy. K E Y W O R D Sbeyond-compliance actions, climate change, corporate social responsibility, environmental policy, GHG emissions, institutional theory, regulation

Building responses to sustainable development challenges: A multistakeholder collaboration framework and application to climate change

“…In this section, we apply the defined framework to describe a case study in the climate change endeavor. Climate change emerged as a major management issue in the sustainable development panorama to be dealt with by society in the next 20 years (De Sousa Jabbour, Vazquez‐Brust, Jabbour, & Ribeiro, 2020; Shaw, Cumbers, McMaster, & Crossan, 2018) that may irreversibly create catastrophic effects for people and the planet (Bryant, griffin, & Perry, 2020).…”

Biodiversity and extinction accounting for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and future research directions

“…Despite the growing interest of accounting academia in environmental research such as climate change (Bryant, Griffin, & Perry, 2019), carbon accounting (Alsaifi, Elnahass, & Salama, 2019) and wider environmental issues (Elmagrhi, Ntim, Elamer, & Zhang, 2018), there is little consideration from scholars on exploring organisational responsibility for the B/E crisis (Atkins & Maroun, 2018; Cuckston, 2013; Jones & Solomon, 2013). Early literature provokes researchers to provide contributions (Jones & Solomon, 2013) and raise awareness on how organisations are engaging in ‘stewardship’ of biodiversity.…”

The Impact of Executives’ Gender, Financial Incentives, and Shareholder Pressure on Corporate Social and Ecological Investments

“…In recent years, public attention to firms' involvement in socially and environmentally responsible business practices has risen, while investors with a focus on socially and ecologically responsible investments have gained prominence and increased their activism (Boiral et al 2017;Michelon and Rodrigue 2015). Research shows that external pressure, such as shareholder concentration or regulatory and institutional pressure, can influence a firm's CSR activities (Beddewela and Fairbrass 2016;Bryant et al 2020;Dam and Scholtens 2013). More specifically, studies suggest that firms tend to respond to shareholder activism on sustainability issues with K an increase in sustainability performance (Grewal et al 2016;Harvey and Pearson 2018); this association is, however, conditional on the shareholder activists' status and their reputation to threaten the firm (Perrault and Clark 2015).…”