2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating disruptions in a multi-echelon supply chain using adaptive ordering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when we turn our attention to Figure 3d, Figure 3b, we observe that as the number of firms increase, ceteris paribus, the severity decreases. This result is congruent with the extant literature which suggests that the complexity of the supply network structure is related to the level of severity (Schmitt et al, 2017). We further emphasize the reasoning for this with two primary explanations with respect to our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, when we turn our attention to Figure 3d, Figure 3b, we observe that as the number of firms increase, ceteris paribus, the severity decreases. This result is congruent with the extant literature which suggests that the complexity of the supply network structure is related to the level of severity (Schmitt et al, 2017). We further emphasize the reasoning for this with two primary explanations with respect to our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As one may expect, when firms are higher in the supply network, their decision's impact to severity appears more sensitive than firms lower in the supply chain. This is in congruence with extant literature that have addressed disruptions and service levels for multi-echelon systems (Schmitt et al, 2017). We also notice that severity is lower when firms produce more than what is ordered, but not too much so as to lead to a disruption in production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We now justify some assumptions and parameters used for simulation experiments. Recent literature , Lücker et al, 2019, Schmitt et al, 2017Gupta and Ivanov, 2020) has recognized the risk mitigation inventory, lead-time and backup suppliers as crucial elements affecting the SC reactions to disruptions. Moreover, the ripple effect is usually accompanying the disruptions which are rarely to be localized and usually spread over many SC echelons (Ivanov et al, 2014, Garvey et al, 2015, Dolgui et al, 2018, Ivanov et al, 2019b, Pavlov et al, 2019b, Li and Zobel, 2020.…”
Section: Research Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation studies allow adding additional, dynamic features to the optimization techniques which are widely used in SC risk analysis , Sadghiani et al, 2015, Cui et al, 2016, Ivanov et al, 2016 along with heuristic approaches (Meena and Sarmah, 2013, Zhang et al, 2015, Hasani and Khosrojerdi, 2016. Most of the existing studies utilize discrete-event simulation approach (Schmitt and Singh, 2012, Ivanov, 2017a, 2017b, Schmitt et al, 2017, Ivanov and Rozhkov, 2017, Macdonald et al, 2018, Ivanov, 2019, Tan et al, 2020 while some studies use agent-based (Li and Chan, 2013, Hou et al, 2018 and system dynamics (Wilson, 2007, Aboah et al, 2019 methods, too. A very few studies (e.g., Hackl and Dubernet, 2019) have incorporated the simulation and transportation disruptions during the epidemic crises.…”
Section: Simulation-based Sc Risk Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%