2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Donmez et al (2008) used driving simulators to test the effect on braking behaviour of real-time and retrospective feedback presented at the end of each trip. The authors found that the results were similar for real-time feedback combined with retrospective feedback and retrospective feedback alone with both showing significant improvement compared to drivers that received no feedback.…”
Section: Real-time and Retrospective Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Donmez et al (2008) used driving simulators to test the effect on braking behaviour of real-time and retrospective feedback presented at the end of each trip. The authors found that the results were similar for real-time feedback combined with retrospective feedback and retrospective feedback alone with both showing significant improvement compared to drivers that received no feedback.…”
Section: Real-time and Retrospective Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an extreme example of the many incidents that occur due to distraction from in-vehicle technology, and it is the focus of much research to actively seek ways to mitigate such events (e.g. Lee et al, 2004;Donmez et al, 2008). One focus within this is to realise the utility of in-vehicle technology while managing the adverse impacts it can have on safety (Lee, 2014;Jamson et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IVIS tasks may lead to distraction and safety consequences when both the task and roadway demands are high and exceed the driver's capacity to respond to critical roadway events (Lee et al, 2008). Drivers may also recognize that there is an increased risk of using IVIS under more demanding driving situations and change their behavior accordingly.…”
Section: Driver Behavioral Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%