2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3924-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating the bilateral deficit: reducing neural deficits through residual force enhancement and activation reduction

Abstract: Residual force enhancement appears to mitigate the BLD, alleviating the effects of a decrease in neural drive by allowing more force for a given level of muscle activation when compared to a purely isometric contraction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the magnitudes of rFE we observed in single fibres (6-46%) are within previously reported ranges in single fibres from the human vastus lateralis 8 . Our observation of ∼30% of participants being rFE non-responders for in-vivo voluntary contractions is also consistent with previous studies 3638 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, the magnitudes of rFE we observed in single fibres (6-46%) are within previously reported ranges in single fibres from the human vastus lateralis 8 . Our observation of ∼30% of participants being rFE non-responders for in-vivo voluntary contractions is also consistent with previous studies 3638 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This phenomenon has been observed in isometric and dynamic contractions in a variety of sports (3,18,21). The BD may represent a control limitation of the neuromuscular system (12) and could have important implications for sports requiring the development of absolute strength (17). This may be especially important to athletes considering that bilateral resistance training can reduce BD or cause a bilateral facilitation (21), where maximal bilateral force production is greater than the sum of unilateral forces (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%