2013
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2013.805433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation of postharvest nitrous oxide emissions from soybean ecosystems: a review

Abstract: In this review, the current knowledge of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) ecosystems, particularly on postharvest N 2 O emissions, is summarized and controlling factors of postharvest N 2 O emissions from soybean ecosystems are discussed. A new biological method to mitigate N 2 O emission is also presented. The latest (2006) guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that N 2 O emissions derived directly from biological nitrogen (N) fixatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by the significant multiple linear regression found for Phase 1 between N2O, N-NO3, N-NH4 and soil temperature, where the N-NO3 is the variable with the highest predictive capability (P<0.001). During Phase 2 the N2O flux magnitude was stable, likely due to the constant degradation rate of the roots nodules (Uchida and Akiyama, 2013). Cumulative N-N2O emissions reported by Barton et al (2011) from a semiarid climate were more than three times lower that our value (127 g N-N2O ha -1 for 350 days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be explained by the significant multiple linear regression found for Phase 1 between N2O, N-NO3, N-NH4 and soil temperature, where the N-NO3 is the variable with the highest predictive capability (P<0.001). During Phase 2 the N2O flux magnitude was stable, likely due to the constant degradation rate of the roots nodules (Uchida and Akiyama, 2013). Cumulative N-N2O emissions reported by Barton et al (2011) from a semiarid climate were more than three times lower that our value (127 g N-N2O ha -1 for 350 days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…Legume residues decomposition is often fast as the carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio is low and the main sources of N2O from N2-fixing crops is the decomposition of the residues (Van Der Weerden et al, 1999;Baggs et al, 2000). Root nodules C/N ratio is lower than the ratio of the other type of plants residues, thus in the soil decomposition of nodules is very fast and can be the major source of N2O during the postharvest period (Uchida and Akiyama, 2013). An experimental field was cultivated with clover (Trifolium squarrosum L.) with the aim to assess the magnitude of N2O daily flux and cumulative emissions in the Mediterranean environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N 2 O is a byproduct or an intermediate product of microbial nitrification and denitrification on the N cycling in soil-plant ecosystems (Cheng et al 2004a, b). There are many studies showing N 2 O emissions from symbiotic N 2 fixation plants, such as leguminous crops and acacia trees as being larger than nonsymbiotic N 2 fixation plants (Arai et al 2008;Mori et al 2010;Uchida and Akiyama 2013;Zhang et al 2014). The N 2 O emission from soybean ecosystems could be mitigated by inoculation of high N 2 O reductase N-fixing rhizobium (Akiyama et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be caused by increases in soil temperature and moisture for the period. The increase in N 2 O flux after harvesting (October) could be derived from decomposition of plant residue and nodule [23]. There was no clear tendency between the N 2 O fluxes from inter-row and from those on the rows with different conditions of the surface soil such as soil moisture across the plots (Figure 2).…”
Section: N 2 O Emissions From the Upland Soybean Fieldmentioning
confidence: 93%