“…Furthermore, comparisons of the initial 5-minute imaging with the 60-minute imaging demonstrated different results from the simple "uptake/retention" rest-stress model. Other investigators have noted similar differences between 5 minute and 60 minute imaging of the heart (Hurwitz 1993, Saha 1994, Giubbini 1995, Pace 2005) allowing for enhanced detection of congestive heart failure (Hurwitz 1998, Kumita 2002, Sugiura 2006, Matsuo 2007, cardiomyopathies (Meissner 2002, Ikawa 2007), Prinzmetal 's angina (Ono 2002(Ono , 2003 and underlying coronary artery disease (Meerdink 1990, Richter 1995, Shin 1995, Takeishi 1996, Takahashi 1996, Fujiwara 1998, Hurwitz 1998, Ayalew 2000, Liu 2001, Kumita 2002, Tanaka 2006, Fukushima 2007, VanBrocklin 2007 including evidence of wash-in (Meerdink 1990, Richter 1995 indicative of critical lesions not detected by conventional MPI. In the same way that thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow is used to look for changes (sometimes subtle, sometimes not) in coronary blood flow in the catch lab, multiple imaging following pharmacologic or EST allows us to take a more advanced look at the physiologic function of the heart, unmasking ischemic heart disease missed by rest-stress imaging.…”