Size, location, gene content, and incidence were determined for 10 lizard mitochondrial DNA duplications. These range from 0.8 to 8.0 kilobases (kb) and account for essentially all of the observed size variation (17-25 kb). Cleavage-site mapping and transfer-hybridization experiments indicate that each duplication is tandem and direct, includes at least one protein or rRNA gene, and is adjacent to or includes the D loop-containing control region. Duplication boundaries are nonrandomly distributed, and most appear to align with tRNA genes, suggesting that these may play a role in the duplication process. Duplications are infrequent and usually restricted to particular individuals or populations. They appear to be ephemeral; in no case is the same duplication shared by mitochondrial DNAs from closely related species. Mitochondrial DNA duplications occur significantly more often in triploid than diploid lizards and at similar frequencies in hybrids and nonhybrids.Although well known for its rapid rate of sequence evolution (1, 2), animal mtDNA also has several highly conserved features, including its genetic content and small size. Virtually all animal mtDNAs studied contain genes for two rRNAs, 22 tRNAs, and the same 13 proteins and have a control region with sequences regulating DNA replication and transcription (3,4). Their small size [16.0-18.0 kilobases (kb); refs. 4 and 5] is partly a consequence of simple genetic organization: there are no introns, and intergenic spacers are absent or very small (3, 4).Size differences in the control region, ranging from a few base pairs (bp) to 1 or 2 kb, are common among closely related animal mtDNAs (4, 6). These differences can be due to variation in the number of nucleotides in homopolymer tracts, to variation in the copy number of short tandem repeats, and to the duplication or deletion of unique sequences (4, 6).Recently, mtDNAs that are 5-10 kb larger than normal have been observed in some lizards (ref. 7; unpublished data), snakes (L. D. Densmore and F. Rose, personal communication), newts (8), frogs (9), fish (M. Hall, personal communication), and nematodes (10). The sequence additions have been characterized for mtDNAs from some lizards (7) and newts (8) and have been shown to be tandem duplications that include protein genes and/or rRNA genes as well as the control region. Similar duplications caused the mtDNA size increases in at least some of the other taxa (M. Hall, personal communication; B. Hyman, personal communication), indicating that the de novo duplication of mtDNA coding sequences is a widespread phenomenon.We have characterized physical, genetic, and evolutionary properties of 10 duplications in mtDNAs from seven species of Cnemidophorus. Cleavage-site mapping and transferhybridization experiments were used to determine the size, boundaries, and genetic content of each duplication. We also have compared the incidence of mtDNA duplication in diploid vs. triploid and in hybrid vs. nonhybrid nuclear backgrounds.