1987
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1987.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial DNA insertion polymorphism and germ line heteroplasmy in the Triturus cristatus complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

1987
1987
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence from Cnemidophorus does not support the suggestion (8) that large DNA insertions are more frequent in hybrids. The restricted geographic and/or phylogenetic distributions of the mtDNA duplications in Cnemidophorus, Heteronotia, and other species (Triturus, ref.…”
contrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evidence from Cnemidophorus does not support the suggestion (8) that large DNA insertions are more frequent in hybrids. The restricted geographic and/or phylogenetic distributions of the mtDNA duplications in Cnemidophorus, Heteronotia, and other species (Triturus, ref.…”
contrasting
confidence: 47%
“…7; unpublished data), snakes (L. D. Densmore and F. Rose, personal communication), newts (8), frogs (9), fish (M. Hall, personal communication), and nematodes (10). The sequence additions have been characterized for mtDNAs from some lizards (7) and newts (8) and have been shown to be tandem duplications that include protein genes and/or rRNA genes as well as the control region. Similar duplications caused the mtDNA size increases in at least some of the other taxa (M. Hall, personal communication; B. Hyman, personal communication), indicating that the de novo duplication of mtDNA coding sequences is a widespread phenomenon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, three general types of length variation have been described (reviewed in ; (1) insertions/deletions of few nucleotides (e.g., Monnerot et al 1984); (2) variations in the copy number of tandemly repeated sequences (Densmore et al 1985;Solignac et al 1986a;LaRoche et al 1990;Rand and Harrison 1989;Boyce et al 1989;Buroker et al 1990;Mignotte et al 1990;Okimoto et al 1991); and (3) duplication/deletions of large regions of the genome Bentzen et al 1988;Wallis 1987;Boursot et al 1987;Cornuet et al 1991). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple copies of mtDNA regions may be present within the mitochondrial genome (e.g., Moritz and Brown, 1986;Wallis, 1987) and may be detected first by the presence of multiple bands or highly atypical size variants of PCR products. Multiple copies may be due to very large (up to 4 kb) repeated regions or deletions, moderate size variations (several to several hundred bp; typical of repeated regions in the control region), or single base differences (e.g., due to insertions or deletions in non-proteincoding DNA regions).…”
Section: Gene Identity and Homology Multiple Copies Of Genes And Hementioning
confidence: 99%