2009
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-2070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase-1 in Human Breast Cancer Independently Predicts Prognosis and Is Repressed by Doxorubicin

Abstract: Purpose: Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase-1 (MKP-1) dephosphorylates mitogen-activated protein kinase [extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun NH 2 -terminal kinase (JNK), and p38], mediates breast cancer chemoresistance, and is repressible by doxorubicin in breast cancer cells. We aimed to characterize doxorubicin effects on MKP-1 and phospho-MAPKs in human breast cancers and to further study the clinical relevance of MKP-1 expression in this disease. Experimental Design: Doxorub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
58
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunohistochemistry was performed according to the methodology previously described by our group (Rojo et al, 2009). In brief, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded 3 mm tissue sections were used for immunostaining using the Dako-Link platform.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Immunohistochemistry was performed according to the methodology previously described by our group (Rojo et al, 2009). In brief, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded 3 mm tissue sections were used for immunostaining using the Dako-Link platform.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To score a cell as positive, nuclear staining was required for MKP-1 expression. The expression was evaluated by calculating a semiquantitative histoscore (H-score) that included the determination of both the percentage of stained target cells and staining intensity (low, medium or high), as described in Rojo et al, (2009). The final score was determined after applying a weighting factor to each estimate and the following formula was used: H-score ¼ (low%) Â 1 þ (medium%) Â 2 þ (high%) Â 3; the results ranged from 0 to 300.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations