“…Therefore, the challenge is going beyond phylogenies of cones based on few genes (Aman et al, ; Puillandre et al, ) and reconstruct robust phylogenetic relationships among cone genera sensu Tucker and Tenorio () based on multilocus sequences data sets such as the recent one based on concatenating hundreds to thousands of exon sequences (Phuong & Mahardika, ). An additional source of molecular markers for phylogenetic inference is mitochondrial (mt) genomes, which have been widely used in gastropods and proven to be particularly useful for resolving phylogenies at the family level (Osca, Templado, & Zardoya, ; Uribe, Williams, Templado, Abalde, & Zardoya, ) as well as for disentangling recent radiation events (Abalde, Tenorio, Afonso, & Zardoya, ; Abalde, Tenorio, Afonso, Uribe, et al, ). Although there are currently about 150 mt genomes of the family Conidae available in GenBank at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), the total diversity of the group is clearly underrepresented as these mitogenomes belong to only 11 out of the currently 89 described genera (the genus Trovaoconus of Tucker and Tenorio () was recently synonymized with Kalloconus by Abalde, Tenorio, Afonso, Uribe, et al, ).…”