2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12983-021-00424-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitonuclear mismatch alters nuclear gene expression in naturally introgressed Rhinolophus bats

Abstract: Background Mitochondrial function involves the interplay between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Such mitonuclear interactions can be disrupted by the introgression of mitochondrial DNA between taxa or divergent populations. Previous studies of several model systems (e.g. Drosophila) indicate that the disruption of mitonuclear interactions, termed mitonuclear mismatch, can alter nuclear gene expression, yet few studies have focused on natural populations. Resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively few genes were differentially expressed between hybrids carrying a SD or SC mitochondrial genotype, which is unlike the substantial variation in nuclear gene expression associated with mitochondrial substitutions in Drosophila sp. (Mossman et al, 2016b(Mossman et al, , 2017(Mossman et al, , 2019 or differences in mitochondrial genotype in horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus affinis; Ding et al, 2021). However, modest effects of mitochondrial genotype on the transcriptome are observed in Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) from natural populations with genetic admixture between two subspecies (Flight et al, 2011;Healy et al, 2017), and only small numbers of genes are differentially expressed between T. californicus from the SD and SC populations (Barreto et al, 2015).…”
Section: Effects Of Mitochondrial Genotype On the Transcriptomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively few genes were differentially expressed between hybrids carrying a SD or SC mitochondrial genotype, which is unlike the substantial variation in nuclear gene expression associated with mitochondrial substitutions in Drosophila sp. (Mossman et al, 2016b(Mossman et al, , 2017(Mossman et al, , 2019 or differences in mitochondrial genotype in horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus affinis; Ding et al, 2021). However, modest effects of mitochondrial genotype on the transcriptome are observed in Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) from natural populations with genetic admixture between two subspecies (Flight et al, 2011;Healy et al, 2017), and only small numbers of genes are differentially expressed between T. californicus from the SD and SC populations (Barreto et al, 2015).…”
Section: Effects Of Mitochondrial Genotype On the Transcriptomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitonuclear epistasis, defined as the non-additive phenotypic effects of interacting mitochondrial and nuclear allele pairs, has been demonstrated across Eukarya, including vertebrates [4][5][6], invertebrates [7][8][9][10][11][12], plants [13] and fungi [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In humans, allelic variation in mitonuclear interactions contributes to human diseases [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low resolution of QTL mapping, specific loci were not identified, but in some cases, regions of mitonuclear genomic interest were implicated. Other approaches to uncovering mitonuclear epistatic loci include differential expression analysis [5, 3941] and experimental evolution [42, 43]. Because relatively few genetic backgrounds are used for these mapping approaches, even if single gene pairs are identified, it is not clear if these approaches will reveal a general picture of mitonuclear epistasis or lineage specific idiosyncrasies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low resolution of QTL mapping, specific loci were not identified, but in some cases, regions of mitonuclear genomic interest were implicated. Other approaches to uncovering mitonuclear epistatic loci include differential expression analysis [5,[39][40][41] and experimental evolution [42,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation