2009
DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.3.7496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitotic crisis: The unmasking of a novel role for RPA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These stalled replication structures are subsequently repaired by error-prone pathways, leading to loss and gain of DNA from chromosomal DNA regions and thereby generating the distribution of G1 cells we observe by FACS. Alternatively, recent work by our laboratory found a role for RPA phosphorylation in stimulating cellular transit through a damaged mitosis (Anantha and Borowiec, 2009;Anantha et al, 2008). We found that mitotic DNA damage in cells replaced with an RPA2 phosphorylation mutant (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These stalled replication structures are subsequently repaired by error-prone pathways, leading to loss and gain of DNA from chromosomal DNA regions and thereby generating the distribution of G1 cells we observe by FACS. Alternatively, recent work by our laboratory found a role for RPA phosphorylation in stimulating cellular transit through a damaged mitosis (Anantha and Borowiec, 2009;Anantha et al, 2008). We found that mitotic DNA damage in cells replaced with an RPA2 phosphorylation mutant (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Because these mutant factors are competent to bind to sites of DNA damage, it has been argued that hyperphosphorylation inhibits RPA loading onto ssDNA by the replication machinery (Vassin et al, 2004). Mitotic RPA2 hyperphosphorylation in response to mitotic DNA damage facilitates release of cells into G1 and increases cell viability, apparently by a signaling mechanism (Anantha and Borowiec, 2009;Anantha et al, 2008). In response to genotoxic stress, it was shown that cells expressing an RPA2 variant that was mutated at both Cdk2 sites (S23 and S29) had aberrant RPA foci and increased persistence of the DNA-damage marker H2AX following genotoxic stress (Anantha et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPA is essential for homologous recombination repair of double-stranded DNA breaks and plays a supporting role in nonhomologous end joining (119). XPA interacts with RPA, and both proteins transmit DNA damage signals to cell cycle checkpoints: XPA to the G 2 /M checkpoint and RPA to the spindle assembly checkpoint (2,64). RPA1 also has a critical role in telomere length maintenance (51).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been reported to interact with, BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are 2 breast cancer susceptibility proteins potentially involved in recombination, as well as tumor suppressor p53 [15,16,17]. Moreover, RPA has been found to act as a key sensor to elicit DNA damage response after cellular exposure to genotoxic stresses and more recently identified as a key mediator of mitotic crisis [18,19]. Since p53 is dysregulated in HCC, it is likely that RPA3 promotes HCC tumorigenesis via perturbation of the p53 function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%