2018
DOI: 10.1177/2045894018791871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MitraClip procedure as ‘bridge to list’, the ultimate therapeutic option for end‐stage heart failure patients not eligible for heart transplantation due to severe pulmonary hypertension

Abstract: Patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), pulmonary hypertension and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) despite medical therapy are not eligible for heart transplantation (HTx). In this ‘proof of concept’ case series, we demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of the MitraClip procedure as ‘bridge to list’ in end-stage HF patients not eligible for HTx. In fact, in the three patients reported, who were initially excluded from the HTx list because of elevated PVR, the MitraClip procedure was followe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data may be particularly relevant for patients who are not eligible for heart transplantation due to PH with elevated PVR. In these patients, a persistent reduction of PVR may lead to eligibility for heart transplantation, as already suggested 15,16 . Therefore, MitraClip may not be conclusive in the management of Cpc‐PH patients as it is not able to treat the pre‐capillary component due to pulmonary vascular remodelling; however, it may be eventually considered as a “bridge to candidacy” strategy to try to reduce PVR and thus make an ineligible patient suitable for heart transplantation or as a “palliative therapy” in patients with end‐stage HF ineligible for transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data may be particularly relevant for patients who are not eligible for heart transplantation due to PH with elevated PVR. In these patients, a persistent reduction of PVR may lead to eligibility for heart transplantation, as already suggested 15,16 . Therefore, MitraClip may not be conclusive in the management of Cpc‐PH patients as it is not able to treat the pre‐capillary component due to pulmonary vascular remodelling; however, it may be eventually considered as a “bridge to candidacy” strategy to try to reduce PVR and thus make an ineligible patient suitable for heart transplantation or as a “palliative therapy” in patients with end‐stage HF ineligible for transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Others have reported similar results in case reports and case series. [25][26] Our study has some limiting factors that should be considered. These include the retrospective recruitment of cases, the small number of patients and lack of long-term follow-up to clarify the mortality benefit of MitraClip and improvement of HF course after reduction of severe MR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in a small series of cases recently published in end-stage HF patients previously excluded for HT due to PH, the use of MitraClip reduced PAP enough to redeem patients eligible for transplantation. This is of course an off-label indication of this device and further evidence is needed to confirm the potential benefit in this scenario 123 .…”
Section: Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 93%