2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-018-1039-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitral valve repair versus replacement with preservation of the entire subvalvular apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers believed that total preservation of sub-valvular apparatus prolongs the time of surgery & implantation of small size prothesis 15 , but findings of our study contradict with the reported evidence as there was no statistically significant difference noted in cardiopulmonary bypass time & cross clamp time (p<0.05) as shown in table-II. Millers et al reported a significant decrease in mortality of patients with preservation of posterior leaflet & sub-valvular apparatus 16 .…”
Section: S719contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Some researchers believed that total preservation of sub-valvular apparatus prolongs the time of surgery & implantation of small size prothesis 15 , but findings of our study contradict with the reported evidence as there was no statistically significant difference noted in cardiopulmonary bypass time & cross clamp time (p<0.05) as shown in table-II. Millers et al reported a significant decrease in mortality of patients with preservation of posterior leaflet & sub-valvular apparatus 16 .…”
Section: S719contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…It is states that the preservation of chords only from the posterior cusp is enough. As the reason for this, some researchers indicate such disadvantages as technical difficulties in preserving the subvalvular apparatus of both valves that prolongs the operation, the possibility of implanting a smaller prosthesis and the possibility of disrupting the outflow pathways from the LV and the contact between the prosthesis and subvalvular structures (18,19). This literature review showed the existing evidence for the advantages of complete preservation of subvalvular structures in valve replacement in the concept of improving immediate results and reducing the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy in the long-term period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature review showed the existing evidence for the advantages of complete preservation of subvalvular structures in valve replacement in the concept of improving immediate results and reducing the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy in the long-term period. According to the actuarial survival curve and the risk of developing heart failure, MVR with complete preservation of the subvalvular structures is not inferior to the results obtained with valve repair (18,19). Even so, the methods of complete preservation of subvalvular structures are still not routinely used and are not included in clinical guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%