Mittelfristige Ergebnisse nach operativer Behandlung der distalen Bizepssehnenruptur

Attmanspacher, Willi; Dittrich, V.; Stedtfeld, Hans-Werner

doi:10.1055/s-2001-12707

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, five of these abstracts did describe the majority of the stated outcome criteria, such as the number of studied SRHP, notation of the follow-up, and suggestion of clinical outcomes of SRHP. These untraceable, potentially eligible articles are described in Table 1 [ 22 - 27 ]. Twelve primary articles, consisting of 153 SRHP, were found and considered suitable for further qualitative analysis [ 8 , 11 , 13 , 24 , 25 , 28 - 34 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the other six cohort studies, the mean patient satisfaction level was 86% and ranged from 71% to 100% after an average of 49 months ( Table 3 ) [ 18 , 35 , 36 , 39 ]. Functional scores were measured in three studies, although with different scoring systems [ 28 , 29 , 27 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Next to the four included case series, six abstracts were found that were potentially eligible but of which no full-text could be retrieved [ 22 - 27 ]. Although conclusions based on these abstracts are of limited value, the results seem to be in line with those of the other outcomes: a clinically well tolerated implant, with varying complication rates but a limited number of synovitis cases ( Table 1 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Silicone radial head prostheses revisited: do they have a role in today’s practice? A systematic review of literature on clinical outcomes

Bussel¹,

Lindenhovius²,

The³

et al. 2023

Clin Shoulder Elb

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Silicone radial head prostheses (SRHP) are considered obsolete due to reports of frequent failure and destructive silicone-induced synovitis. Considering the good outcomes of modern non-radial silicone joint implants, the extent of scientific evidence for this negative view is unclear. The aim of this research was to systematically analyze the clinical evidence on complications and outcomes of SRHP and how SRHP compare to both non-SRHP and silicone prostheses of other joints. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted through the Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases. Results: Eight cohort studies were included, consisting of 142 patients and follow-up periods ranging from 23 months to 8 years. Average patient satisfaction was 86%, range of 71–100%, and 58 complications were seen, but no cases of synovitis. These outcomes were in line with non-SRHP. Four case series with 11 cases of synovitis were found, all due to implant fractures years to decades after implantation. Six systematic reviews of currently used non-radial silicone joint implants showed excellent outcomes with low complication rates.Conclusions: Since SRHP have satisfactory clinical results and an acceptable complication rate when selecting a patient group in suitable condition for surgical indications, it is considered that SRHP can still be chosen as a potential surgical treatment method in current clinical practice.

show abstract