2020
DOI: 10.1037/emo0000566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mix it to fix it: Emotion regulation variability in daily life.

Abstract: We thank our student research assistants and interns for their help with the data collection. We would also like to express our gratitude to our participants. This is a study containing multiple data sets from different laboratories. Results from these datasets were previously published to test different research questions. A list of the publications pertaining to each data set is provided in the Method section of the manuscript.We report how we determined our sample sizes, all exclusions of participants, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
220
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
11
220
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the selection stage, a person now considers their available emotion regulation strategy options (e.g., Gross, ; Niven, Totterdell, & Holman, ; Parkinson & Totterdell, ) and features of the world that may affect their desired strategy choice (e.g., emotional intensity; Sheppes et al, ; cognitive resources; Gyurak, Goodkind, Kramer, Miller, & Levenson, ; P). People will vary in the extent to which they typically consider a wide range of ER strategies (Blanke et al, ; De France & Hollenstein, ; Eldesouky & English, ) or specific ER strategies (e.g., Gross & John, ; Williams, Morelli, Ong, & Zaki, ). After considering their strategy options, a person evaluates the utility of each strategy in light of his or her situation (V).…”
Section: A Process Model Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the selection stage, a person now considers their available emotion regulation strategy options (e.g., Gross, ; Niven, Totterdell, & Holman, ; Parkinson & Totterdell, ) and features of the world that may affect their desired strategy choice (e.g., emotional intensity; Sheppes et al, ; cognitive resources; Gyurak, Goodkind, Kramer, Miller, & Levenson, ; P). People will vary in the extent to which they typically consider a wide range of ER strategies (Blanke et al, ; De France & Hollenstein, ; Eldesouky & English, ) or specific ER strategies (e.g., Gross & John, ; Williams, Morelli, Ong, & Zaki, ). After considering their strategy options, a person evaluates the utility of each strategy in light of his or her situation (V).…”
Section: A Process Model Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…. †Although the within-person Cronbach's alpha was relatively low for this 2-item momentary rumination measure, we opted to use this in our analyses for consistency with previous published studies using this dataset (Blanke et al, 2019;Kalokerinos et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. (Blanke et al, 2019): Using data from four experience-sampling studies, Blanke and colleagues investigated the importance of the context on ER. According to their results, ER strategies are not adaptive or maladaptive; instead, adaptiveness is the result of the variability in choosing strategies based on situational demands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%