2016
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Carcinoma as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Submucosal Invasive Gastric Carcinoma

Abstract: Mixed carcinoma shows a mixture of glandular and signet ring/poorly cohesive cellular histological components and the prognostic significance of each component is not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the significance of the poorly cohesive cellular histological component as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis and to examine the diagnostic reliability of endoscopic biopsy. Clinicopathologic characteristics of 202 patients who underwent submucosal invasive gastric carcinoma resection with ly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, one can only speculate that the cumulative effect of the adverse behaviours of intestinal and diffuse-type gastric carcinoma is responsible for the greater biological aggressiveness of mixed-type gastric carcinoma compared to "pure" intestinal and diffuse gastric carcinoma [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. The level of existing evidence is too low for a definitive conclusion.…”
Section: Statement 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, one can only speculate that the cumulative effect of the adverse behaviours of intestinal and diffuse-type gastric carcinoma is responsible for the greater biological aggressiveness of mixed-type gastric carcinoma compared to "pure" intestinal and diffuse gastric carcinoma [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. The level of existing evidence is too low for a definitive conclusion.…”
Section: Statement 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed GC, defined by a dual pattern of differentiationglandular/solid (intestinal) and isolated-cell carcinoma (diffuse) -carried, in a multivariate analysis, significantly worse prognosis than the 2 main types of the Laurén classification [18,27]. As further proof, several authors demonstrated that mixed GCs display more aggressive features than "pure" intestinal and diffuse GCs, including larger tumour size, deeper invasion, lymphatic invasion, and lymph node metastases [27][28][29][30][31]. Interestingly, mixed GC shows a dual metastatic pattern (hematogenous metastases and peritoneal dissemination with lymph node metastases), suggesting a cumulative effect of the adverse behaviours of intestinal and diffuse-type GC [32].…”
Section: Morphological Heterogeneity Of Gcmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The recognition of this morphological entity is important, as it carries a bad prognosis compared to intestinal and diffuse GC (see Morphological Heterogeneity of GC, above). However, previous studies have shown that preoperative endoscopic biopsies have a limited value in predicting the presence of both components [29,31,87]. This is a clear example of how ITH may limit the correct pathological diagnosis and patient prognostic evaluation.…”
Section: Adding Further Complexity: Ithmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, mixed‐type EGC can be simply classified as predominantly differentiated (MD) or predominantly undifferentiated (MU) types. Various studies have investigated the risk of LNM in these two types of EGC . Mita and Shimoda compared the clinicopathological features of submucosal differentiated EGC with and without LNM, and found that the rate of LNM in mixed EGC was higher, which was further identified in the multivariate analysis .…”
Section: Endoscopic Resection Indications For Egcmentioning
confidence: 99%