1989
DOI: 10.3758/bf03329884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed case and masking interact in word recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each six-letter word or nonword contained three lowercase and three uppercase letters. The use of mixed-case presentation typically makes word recognition more difficult (Coltheart & Freeman, 1974; Hochhaus, Williams, & Polk, 1989) and reduces but does not eliminate the word-superiority effect (Bruder, 1978; McNamara, Ward, & Juola, 1978; Mewhort & Johns, 1988; Pollatsek et al, 1975; but see McClelland, 1976, who found no reduction). Sanocki (1988) found that mixed-font presentation reduced letter recognition, but Adams (1979) found no decrease in the word advantage on accuracy of report following a brief backward masked presentation when radically different type fonts were mixed.…”
Section: Experiments 1–3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each six-letter word or nonword contained three lowercase and three uppercase letters. The use of mixed-case presentation typically makes word recognition more difficult (Coltheart & Freeman, 1974; Hochhaus, Williams, & Polk, 1989) and reduces but does not eliminate the word-superiority effect (Bruder, 1978; McNamara, Ward, & Juola, 1978; Mewhort & Johns, 1988; Pollatsek et al, 1975; but see McClelland, 1976, who found no reduction). Sanocki (1988) found that mixed-font presentation reduced letter recognition, but Adams (1979) found no decrease in the word advantage on accuracy of report following a brief backward masked presentation when radically different type fonts were mixed.…”
Section: Experiments 1–3mentioning
confidence: 99%