“…A large number of papers have been published using different technologies 1,3,6,8,[15][16][17][18] (probably too many from a personal viewpoint) and in certain forms of leukaemia and aplastic anaemia, relevant studies have attempted to tease out the relevance of complete donor chimerism, mixed chimerism (stable, transient and progressive) in the context of relapse, graft rejection and risk of GVHD. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][19][20][21][22] The time is now ripe to standardise approaches to (1) sample collection, allowing for selection of specific cell lineages which are becoming increasingly relevant in relapse prediction, 23,24 (2) timing of chimerism analysis (which will be undoubtedly critical for prospective studies), chimerism technology (which should probably be PCR based, relying either on established short tandem repeat or variable number tandem repeat PCR used by many of the most active laboratories in this area, or by adapting real time PCR approaches or other methodologies for truly quantitative assessment of chimerism post allogeneic SCT). Molecular diagnostic development on a Europe-wide basis has been employed extremely successfully in BIOMED and Europe Against Cancer Consortia for the establishment of standardised assays for assessment of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, either using RQ-PCR of specific chromosomal translocations 25 or real time PCR approaches for T cell receptor and immunoglobulin gene rearrangement assays 26 and a similar approach to standardisation in chimerism analysis will allow the development of large-scale prospective studies with sufficient statistical power to provide the relevant data for clinical intervention.…”