2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-effects generalized height–diameter model for young silver birch stands on post-agricultural lands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taper models can be elaborated for the use of the mixed-effects modelling approach. One of the main advantages of this solution is the possibility of implementing random effects during feature prediction, using a small amount of additional measurements in a plot (Pinheiro and Bates 2013;Bronisz and Mehtätalo 2020). In this context, Arias-Rodil et al (2015) indicated that additional section diameters measured between 40% and 60% of the total tree height showed the greatest improvement in volume and diameter predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taper models can be elaborated for the use of the mixed-effects modelling approach. One of the main advantages of this solution is the possibility of implementing random effects during feature prediction, using a small amount of additional measurements in a plot (Pinheiro and Bates 2013;Bronisz and Mehtätalo 2020). In this context, Arias-Rodil et al (2015) indicated that additional section diameters measured between 40% and 60% of the total tree height showed the greatest improvement in volume and diameter predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During analyses heteroscedasticity in the residuals was also included. In the case of heteroscedastic data, analysing likelihood ratio test and solutions containing various functions and predictors, a power-type variance function with tree diameter at breast height as a predictor were applied (De-Miquel et al 2012;Arias-Rodil et al 2015;Bronisz and Mehtätalo 2020).…”
Section: Mixed-effects Taper Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where in there is a lack of measurements, only fixed-effects can be used, yet additional measurements allow random-effects to be predicted [66]. Consequently, it allows for greater predictions accuracy in plots where additional measurements are available [44]. However, in the case of biomass modeling, obtaining additional measurements is troublesome because it is associated with the felling of trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the fixed part of mixed-effects models provides predictions for a typical plot and in case of nonlinear models it could be biased [42]. However, if even a small amount of local measurements are available, a more accurate random-effect prediction can be used [43,44]. In the multivariate modeling context, such prediction utilizes the cross-model correlations of the model system, thus taking into account the logical interactions between the biomass components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, h-d models can be defined as simple and generalized. Simple models express height as a function of tree diameter at breast height (Bronisz and Mehtätalo 2020). This modeling approach represents the best equation that can be obtained for specific stand and point in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%